Re: [earlywarning] (no subject)

Absolutely!

Carl

> Once again, this is NOT about a solution limited to wireless cellular
> networks.  It is about a solution for internet connected endpoints of all
> kinds.
>
> Brian
>
>
> On 3/25/10 7:46 PM, "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com> wrote:
>
>> Keith  We agree with you, and to further the point, in wireless
>> cellular IP
>> networks a point to point solution would be problematic. Cell Broadcast
>> is
>> used for CMAS because SMS cannot be used for any real time alerting  it
>> was
>> not designed for that application and has serious limitations, as the
>> FCC
>> CMSAAC studied.
>>
>> When it comes to the evolved packet core and IMS, again a point to point
>> solution  will cause significant congestion on the network and a
>> broadcast/multicast solution must be used to effectively deliver alert
>> messages. Thus things like location and ³priority² are already handled
>> in the
>> delivery network.
>>
>> ATIS and 3GPP will be studying how to support multimedia alerts in the
>> future,
>> as recommended by the FCC CMSAAC. This is all beyond the scope of this
>> work
>> effort.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>>
>> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:13:24 +0100
>> From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Updated Charter Text for ATOCA
>> To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>,
>>       "earlywarning@ietf.org" <earlywarning@ietf.org>
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE20D1639BB@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.c
>> om>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> What I am not seeing here is any separation of the problem from the one
>> that
>> cell broadcast attempts to solve. Fundamentally, cell broadcast, as
>> exists on
>> all GSM, UTRAN and E-UTRAN based cell phones and is being used for
>> Tsunami
>> warning and Public Warning, exists and is not going to substantially
>> change.
>> The major limitation here is is length of message, and what does get
>> transmitted will be very much dependent on that restriction.
>>
>> Moreover I have heard from a number of governmental bodies that they are
>> happy
>> with that situation and are not envisaging further standardisation in
>> that
>> area outside of 3GPP.
>>
>> So my view at the moment is that there is no point in IETF trying to
>> address
>> the scope of what is already specified in cell broadcast (from base
>> station to
>> end mobile).
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> earlywarning mailing list
>> earlywarning@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
>
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
>