[Ecrit] FW: GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02
"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Sun, 21 February 2010 07:30 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A6D28C0ED for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:30:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGknp42sZBVY for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:30:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE25328C0DD for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o1L7SpQm016817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:28:52 +0100
Received: from demuexc023.nsn-intra.net (demuexc023.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.36]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o1L7Sp1x027361; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:28:51 +0100
Received: from FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by demuexc023.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:28:51 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:27:19 +0200
Message-ID: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450238916C@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02
Thread-Index: AcqvT22EAGL9MOrkR2m5ssox4nkwNwDGEcwQ
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: ext Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2010 07:28:51.0233 (UTC) FILETIME=[83C34910:01CAB2C7]
Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
Subject: [Ecrit] FW: GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:30:19 -0000
Thanks for your review, Ben. Let me provide a response below. >-----Original Message----- >From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On >Behalf Of ext Ben Campbell >Sent: 16 February, 2010 23:31 >To: hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu; Laura.Liess@t-systems.com; >Hannes Tschofenig; barbara.stark@att.com; >andres.kytt@skype.net; General Area Review Team >Cc: Cullen Jennings; marc.linsner@cisco.com; IETF-Discussion list >Subject: GenART Telechat review of >draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02 > >I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) >reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > >Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD >before posting a new version of the draft. > >Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02 >Reviewer: Ben Campbell >Review Date: 16 Feb 2010 >IESG Telechat date: 18 Feb 2010 > >Summary: This draft is really close to ready for publication >as an informational RFC. I have one unaddressed editorial >comment, which on reflection I am promoting to a minor issue, >as well as a few more editorial comments that should probably >not block publication. > >Major issues: >Minor issues: > >-- section 3.3, first bullet: > >I'm still a little confused by seeing a normative MUST in a >section entitled "Desirable Properties". If it's really a >MUST, then perhaps it should be promoted to a bona-fide >requirement? Otherwise, perhaps it should be a SHOULD? That was probably my mistake from an English point of view. I changed it to "Miscellaneous Properties". > >Nits/editorial comments: > >-- Req-10: The solution MUST allow the end host to determine >PSAP/ESRP URLs prior to the call, for all emergency services. > >Who is the "end host"? Your laptop, your mobile phone, your desktop PC, your Internet tablet, ... Do you think I should add something like "end host (such as a laptop or a mobile phone)" to clarify this issue? > >-- section 3.3, third bullet: > >s/"...break by the presence..."/"...break in the presence..." > [or "...be broken by the presence..."] > Fixed. > >-- idnits has some new things to say. (I suspect the >boilerplate complaints have to do with the paragraphs >splitting across page breaks.) > >> tmp/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02.txt: >> >> Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see >> http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): >> >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------ >> >> ** The document seems to lack a License Notice according IETF Trust >> Provisions of 28 Dec 2009, Section 6.b.i or Provisions >of 12 Sep 2009 >> Section 6.b -- however, there's a paragraph with a >matching beginning. >> Boilerplate error? >> >> (You're using the IETF Trust Provisions' Section 6.b >License Notice from >> 12 Feb 2009 rather than one of the newer Notices. See >> http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/.) >> >> >> Checking nits according to >http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt: >> >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------ >> >> No issues found here. >> >> Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: >> >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------ >> >> No issues found here. >> >> Miscellaneous warnings: >> >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------ >> >> == The copyright year in the IETF Trust and authors >Copyright Line does not >> match the current year >> >> == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 >boilerplate, even if >> it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's >a paragraph with >> a matching beginning. Boilerplate error? >> >> (The document does seem to have the reference to RFC >2119 which the >> ID-Checklist requires). >> == The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 >work, but was >> first submitted before 10 November 2008. Should you >add the disclaimer? >> (See the Legal Provisions document at >> http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.). >> >> >> Checking references for intended status: Informational >> >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------ >> >> == Outdated reference: A later version (-10) exists of >> draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-09 >> >> == Outdated reference: A later version (-10) exists of >> draft-ietf-ecrit-framework-09 >> >> == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of >> draft-ietf-geopriv-lbyr-requirements-07 >> >> == Outdated reference: A later version (-16) exists of >> draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-15 >> >> >> Summary: 1 error (**), 7 warnings (==), 0 comments (--). >> >> Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed >information about >> the items above. >> >> > Fixed the indicated references and update IPR template. Ciao Hannes
- [Ecrit] FW: GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell