Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Thanks! I have one remaining comment. The rest are handled by your other comments.

On Feb 21, 2010, at 1:27 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:

>> 
>> I'm still a little confused by seeing a normative MUST in a 
>> section entitled "Desirable Properties". If it's really a 
>> MUST, then perhaps it should be promoted to a bona-fide 
>> requirement? Otherwise, perhaps it should be a SHOULD?
> 
> That was probably my mistake from an English point of view. 
> I changed it to "Miscellaneous Properties". 

Thanks, that helps, and I think it pushes it back down to an editorial comment.  But I still wonder why a normative requirement like this is not one of the labeled requirements. Right now, it's sort of like saying "We've got requirements A, B,C, 1, 2, 3, and this other thing".