Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02

"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 21 February 2010 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6998728C0E1 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:44:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JU9M6eWS+pdp for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:44:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DB3C3A6B67 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:44:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 20840 invoked by uid 0); 21 Feb 2010 19:46:35 -0000
Received: from 88.115.222.204 by www001.gmx.net with HTTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:46:33 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:46:33 +0100
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <D438D3CB-F207-4D75-A5DC-D40736BE3B63@estacado.net>
Message-ID: <20100221194633.52090@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450238916C@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <D438D3CB-F207-4D75-A5DC-D40736BE3B63@estacado.net>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>, hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19O/U9KDKFO0ZjQ2c6qJekh06BFp4q4Zifb+d441C v7lCg9H8UzV723yU1LAtL7OGq9rqwV0PmKbA==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-GMX-UID: q7u0eix8bUk7IcVQ8GknYkpsZ2hlN4rm
X-FuHaFi: 0.73999999999999999
Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:44:44 -0000

> Thanks, that helps, and I think it pushes it back down to an editorial
> comment.  But I still wonder why a normative requirement like this is not one
> of the labeled requirements. Right now, it's sort of like saying "We've got
> requirements A, B,C, 1, 2, 3, and this other thing".


I looked at it again and the classification appears to be a bit arbitrary.
I changed it again and flattened the structure. 

I re-submitted a new version. 

Ciao
Hannes