Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02
Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net> Fri, 26 February 2010 21:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@estacado.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D263A8722; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:23:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8NS4aTokt8B; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:23:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from estacado.net (estacado-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:266::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C283A8849; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dn3-174.estacado.net (dn3-174.estacado.net [172.16.3.174]) (authenticated bits=0) by estacado.net (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o1QLPbwG041819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:25:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@estacado.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20100221194633.52090@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:25:37 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6903DD98-05C1-489C-86F6-C92DDE47F564@estacado.net>
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450238916C@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <D438D3CB-F207-4D75-A5DC-D40736BE3B63@estacado.net> <20100221194633.52090@gmx.net>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com, ecrit@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:23:29 -0000
Hi, Version 04 addresses all of my concerns. Thanks! Ben. On Feb 21, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >> Thanks, that helps, and I think it pushes it back down to an editorial >> comment. But I still wonder why a normative requirement like this is not one >> of the labeled requirements. Right now, it's sort of like saying "We've got >> requirements A, B,C, 1, 2, 3, and this other thing". > > > I looked at it again and the classification appears to be a bit arbitrary. > I changed it again and flattened the structure. > > I re-submitted a new version. > > Ciao > Hannes
- [Ecrit] FW: GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell