IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ecrit] FW: Does anyone support Planned-Changed?

hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net Fri, 08 September 2023 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8075DC151064 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BhmhqQu6xN9x for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 07:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89423C14CE22 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 07:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1694183090; x=1694787890; i=hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net; bh=UEDw32ZVNjlC4DlZonNScuWbfd/lgm9+/WPkxOr8FAg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=h91CsUUHkjU9FvyGu/xm7y7wj6AYG7f/XSA9uh7xyLjwt/v08sSNEKdVHNevSSg+KWMUNef SofP97hqPsoArUg0TauFD42QZN17XVDwD8yY/Yh7VWXm6I+Lx0sYh+bKpi5XDGWOyASWdlC9s e2gjbK4u1AjL2weM4w7YXcFAlA0pRzVuswb7DBsvn+T14S1Tml1deIHJP2qxPaHgXey1mKoLV 9Gw1JMO5qtseRXyB2dJ9ahZMXPDjHfUnLFp2s9PuiTyhiFC7OUEfpb7PhGGy0djTYEnNSvfm8 n+leF8YDLPW7TOeEzSL3IgXf0MV7seAXPtEyqiIxz8vjL6L6Kuug==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from Surface ([213.162.81.217]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MDhhX-1qW3QU1zTr-00Ap0K for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 16:24:50 +0200
From: hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net
To: 'ECRIT' <ecrit@ietf.org>
References: <169219476007.7384.18270557568145715058@ietfa.amsl.com> <8ED387FA-8A0B-4BA4-A96B-787697400C5D@randy.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To:
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 16:24:46 +0200
Message-ID: <03e001d9e260$39e27320$ada75960$@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03E1_01D9E270.FD6C2D80"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGnmrxPN0+ajuLaSLQ7BjyvrDhaeAEMzA0PAmSdz8uwWf+OIA==
Content-Language: de-at
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ePnixI3mqYM2pqN588TIc9xaQfo3UGV87XShWvEaqvFYzDh0/O5 fYqSAVMjaE52npf5RNU3Mk3zo50njOLFcj2Z5DKOJHQvI/3fCkrQUFMOioYpATUkGZ6a2/m visXsS5MlBzMPQXijhMYwNzyEwGreuawkW3EidFhrqE2LKS0We6iUfjdSC1N3k17WQDKbsW 6eqIVrGzAwPreYC0cWWuA==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:PjmSbauIcKs=;kUUrYh2visCU4844pq4Lw21d45v dwNDmjJ3N93WrEuRzECJSaZ7hR+5i8U03EzKXUhxGPqtCsLGSZle0K6dC8TXIVxs0DuCaNc7s RxojuJyFJRPcejgfTzraZcrTw3E8fw0UpGarbrKOprXxumpaYbgHlg/x3pN/D33QP74y1rQx0 n4P2PwSnnvNCsJLkHjkBZnHe3gYiNUAK9wT6Ydfc9vEhHBbeip9eu7rVtiYskQyy+ZajTFawH D5EINBm5U7yS71DO4aTMReQ5ojFIPo41OBCR+B7cpdg4Vpb7cPfqfLpUMZiRZI5M+g82DV/Av 23Sc9BgevA5QT8wwPiA9PN7oe9nNzAWri6WTb8w8djN8pLnbP8sx0xT3k3gFlhs+bXxb48Wam xLe33CqwElfl/iO6taBh1a4QrkgWsNqIZIJpLJym7tCQn4PYcyO2rl2x14IcYf1Z/Nntm9lUF /ajI9K1e3HOgn29UsYCfXb3F61z39jQZUr3209APL4cwdF0ifNKMPd15nA94elIdZGr1NSxL6 jmTX8b//jH6eHPeev9fV8p6i6kLhNCSabNQ3YbXG2zbokDmJcuI2wyJk0BEm6/imhL5RIjw8D 3ifEtFEkv2I/3uFQFQM9M432YdpQokZdxIfzeqAlAww4etsF7sANaqbLJZapWOP86DW3n9Mmj RbzB+TnrbNXITnVqLYDVzWnH4V1ff3KKkeTb6ngw2dZazfuhD2SbjuntwlISpGD+wnHWYZgnD yU6N/fQspRatVw1rZsJQh/EXBK1RgRzHXvIx6anR/5qkhMQuq4+i18bM/jypTF58b9R+mBSrc gtacAOhfYxudH+fxCrqBG+2NbBkwGxSwG7xKLnkHIRxE5n7gyFakb5di+NMchg8rXJdlL1InF KHEuvRYMYgElrErOwpa1fCReJw+qx+9sGunG+QOjVdEXxSDMD9JbgRwuVvlISiflisXHXCqla P/cyf6/4JOCj7LyUvbCjWhtOa7M=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/615kNURTuMQN4p03PJjXJUR5JZU>
Subject: [Ecrit] FW: Does anyone support Planned-Changed?
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 14:24:56 -0000

Resending

 

From: hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> 
Sent: Freitag, 8. September 2023 14:55
To: 'Randall Gellens' <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>; 'ECRIT' <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Ecrit] Does anyone support Planned-Changed?

 

Hi Randy,

 

I have read the document and I believe it is a useful and important extension. 

 

Here are my high-level comments. 

 

1. On the editorial side, please expand LIS when first used.

 

2. Section 3 talks about "entry points" in context of the new RESTful APIs. The correct terminolgy would, however, be "endpoints". The description of the API in that section is incomplete. A reference to section 8 would be appropriate, which uses the OpenAPI functionality (which I am not familiar with).

 

3. The more substantive comment concerns the introduction of the XML schema for LoST. Since the title does not indicate the presence of this description in the document it is a bit surprising. I was wondering why you didn't just produce a new draft that contains the XML schema where the title clearly indicates it. 

 

There is one annoying consequence: if you introduce two schema languages for LoST, namely RelaxNG and the XML schema, then every extension going forward should actually specify the extension in both schema languages to deal with the installed base. 

 

FWIW I have not checked the XML schema against the Relax NG schema and validated the examples against this new schema. I hope Brian did it. It would be unfortunate if the newly proposed XML schema is not in sync with the previously published functionalty or even buggy.

 

Ciao

Hannes

 

 

 

From: Ecrit <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org> > On Behalf Of Randall Gellens
Sent: Mittwoch, 30. August 2023 18:39
To: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org> >
Subject: [Ecrit] Does anyone support Planned-Changed?

 

Members of IETF ECRIT WG:

The two-week IETF WG Last Call on the Planned Changes drat closes TODAY. Supposedly, this is a document that NENA i3 needs and has been waiting on.

To date the IETF ECRIT mailing list has received exactly ZERO comments on the draft during this WG last call. The logical conclusion is that no one cares about the draft and it should die. Is that accurate? Or is it just that everyone is still on August break/doldrums? I need to know.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes/

There is also an HTML version available at:
 <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.html> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
 <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08

--Randall

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email