Re: [Ecrit] WGLC: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08

Speaking as a WG participant, I have read this draft and support 
advancing it.

--Randall

On 16 Aug 2023, at 7:19, Randall Gellens wrote:

> This begins WGLC for draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.
>
> It will be a standard 2 week last call ending August 30.
>
> Please send statements of support and any final comments to the list.
>
>
> --Randall
>
> Forwarded message:
>
>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Ecrit] I-D Action: 
>> draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.txt
>> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:06:00 -0700
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Emergency 
>> Context
>> Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) WG of the IETF.
>>
>>    Title           : Validation of Locations Around a Planned Change
>>    Author          : Brian Rosen
>>    Filename        : draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.txt
>>    Pages           : 21
>>    Date            : 2023-08-16
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This document defines an extension to the Location to Service
>>    Translation (LoST) protocol (RFC5222) that allows a LoSR server ti
>>    notify a client of planned changes to the data.  This extension is
>>    only useful with the validation function of LoST.  It is 
>> beneficial
>>    for LoST validation clients to be aware of planned changes, as
>>    records that previously were valid may become invalid at a known
>>    future date, and new locations may become valid after the date.  
>> This
>>    extension adds an element to the <findService> request: a date 
>> that
>>    allows the LoST client to request that the server perform 
>> validation
>>    as of the date specified.  It adds an optional Time-To-Live 
>> element
>>    to the response, which informs clients of the current expected
>>    lifetime of a validation.  It also adds a separate interface to 
>> the
>>    LoST server that allows a client to poll for planned changes.
>>    Additionally, this document provides a conventional XML schema for
>>    LoST, as a backwards compatible alternative to the RelaxNG schema 
>> in
>>    RFC5222.
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes/
>>
>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.html
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at 
>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ecrit mailing list
>> Ecrit@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit