[Ecrit] WGLC: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com> Wed, 16 August 2023 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E77C15155A; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M1EOzW-Ov-Io; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77345C14CF18; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [99.111.97.131] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:19:35 -0700
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com>
To: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Cc: ecrit-chairs@ietf.org, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:19:34 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5937)
Message-ID: <06333009-808E-41D3-93FE-AC708645E726@coretechnologyconsulting.com>
References: <169219476007.7384.18270557568145715058@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/S1qoMnfUimZdqzaWBcl9DcWo7Xk>
Subject: [Ecrit] WGLC: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:19:40 -0000

This begins WGLC for draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.

It will be a standard 2 week last call ending August 30.

Please send statements of support and any final comments to the list.


--Randall

Forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
> Subject: [Ecrit] I-D Action: 
> draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.txt
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:06:00 -0700
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Emergency 
> Context
> Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) WG of the IETF.
>
>    Title           : Validation of Locations Around a Planned Change
>    Author          : Brian Rosen
>    Filename        : draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.txt
>    Pages           : 21
>    Date            : 2023-08-16
>
> Abstract:
>    This document defines an extension to the Location to Service
>    Translation (LoST) protocol (RFC5222) that allows a LoSR server ti
>    notify a client of planned changes to the data.  This extension is
>    only useful with the validation function of LoST.  It is beneficial
>    for LoST validation clients to be aware of planned changes, as
>    records that previously were valid may become invalid at a known
>    future date, and new locations may become valid after the date.  
> This
>    extension adds an element to the <findService> request: a date that
>    allows the LoST client to request that the server perform 
> validation
>    as of the date specified.  It adds an optional Time-To-Live element
>    to the response, which informs clients of the current expected
>    lifetime of a validation.  It also adds a separate interface to the
>    LoST server that allows a client to poll for planned changes.
>    Additionally, this document provides a conventional XML schema for
>    LoST, as a backwards compatible alternative to the RelaxNG schema 
> in
>    RFC5222.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at 
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit