IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ecrit] Does anyone support Planned-Changed?

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Wed, 30 August 2023 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B99C15155A for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4EC2s6VVGLws for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F5BC15108C for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [99.111.97.131] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:39:23 -0700
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
To: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:39:21 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5937)
Message-ID: <8ED387FA-8A0B-4BA4-A96B-787697400C5D@randy.pensive.org>
References: <169219476007.7384.18270557568145715058@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_69D26DAE-A26A-48D4-AF25-BF5CADB9D17D_="
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/IAqL2YircbSAhaZ6iIkiw2AZ6ZQ>
Subject: [Ecrit] Does anyone support Planned-Changed?
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:39:24 -0000

Members of IETF ECRIT WG:

The two-week IETF WG Last Call on the Planned Changes drat closes 
**TODAY**. Supposedly, this is a document that NENA i3 needs and has 
been waiting on.

To date the IETF ECRIT mailing list has received exactly **ZERO** 
comments on the draft during this WG last call. The logical conclusion 
is that no one cares about the draft and it should die. Is that 
accurate? Or is it just that everyone is still on August break/doldrums? 
I need to know.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-08


--Randall

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email