IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 06 August 2014 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C55F1A014D for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 10:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4zcYYaV-eqkB for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 10:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 343AD1ABB2B for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 10:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79ba6d000000fe1-01-53e2619cdc8f
Received: from ESESSHC017.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7F.38.04065.C9162E35; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 19:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.4]) by ESESSHC017.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.69]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 19:10:51 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Marc Linsner (mlinsner)" <mlinsner@cisco.com>, "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
Thread-Index: AQHPqmcDQBOWz8idXUOAditSmLV3JpvD3dJX
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:10:51 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3E202B@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CFFBC6E2.5D512%mlinsner@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CFFBC6E2.5D512%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3E202BESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6cxEfBBueaxSwaFz1ltTh7+Tqj A5PHlN8bWT2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXx8GUPW8EqpYrGN2eYGxj3y3QxcnJICJhI TNnxihHCFpO4cG89WxcjF4eQwFFGiYX3/kA5CxklTnaCVHFwsAlYSHT/0wZpEBEIl5hw+BAb iC0sYChx9/9KVoi4kcTJFesZYey/D9ewgNgsAioSixq2MYHYvAK+Eq+WTGMHsYUE9CXWX93A CjKeU8BA4uQhIZAwI9A930+tAStnFhCXuPVkPhPEnQISS/acZ4awRSVePv7HCmErSuw8284M UZ8vcevBU6hVghInZz5hmcAoMgvJqFlIymYhKYOIG0i8PzefGcLWlli28DWUrS+x8ctZRmTx BYzsqxhFi1OLk3LTjYz0Uosyk4uL8/P08lJLNjECo+rglt8GOxhfPnc8xCjAwajEw/sg+GGw EGtiWXFl7iFGaQ4WJXHehefmBQsJpCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgLDzS9MvjXqU8 z4KZd7ubriw7YfnRp0W3pJVnpetMwQgD/Y/bllTyzEvbvjJf1qFWrkPmx/neyCr3U8vlX72/ 5eov+HRNwbZFDTc+Xnz6dfJB5Z9vf/tNm5Kzu5SZI+qiafPyxbkWfknrvA409ehtSc/ZaLdk uhBLVtPR/ZtMZ/tomYZwnu2bpsRSnJFoqMVcVJwIANiKg5eLAgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/7r21Px-8uioZN6rnqfvdrER1hqA
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:11:02 -0000

Hi,



I support option #1.



Regards,



Christer



________________________________
From: Ecrit [ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Marc Linsner (mlinsner) [mlinsner@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, 28 July 2014 4:22 PM
To: ecrit@ietf.org
Subject: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04

All,

This draft was presented in a compressed time slot at the Toronto meeting last week.  James W. has indicated an urgency to move this work forward.  The chairs are asking everyone to review this from the perspective of adopting this draft as a wg item.  So, please review this from the overall architectural value of providing emergency call routing within a HELD req/response (protocol details and word smithing can be done after it becomes a wg item).

Since James has indicated this work will be used by other SDOs, and coupled with the stated urgency, the chairs request that you review the draft and indicate to the list by COB Wednesday August 6, 2014 your opinion:

  1.  I believe this work should move forward in ECRIT
  2.  I’m agnostic to this work and don’t care either way
  3.  I’m opposed to this architectural change to the ECRIT model and believe this work should not be adopted.

A indication of #2 tells the chairs that you are aware of the work and truly don’t have an opinion, it helps us in determining what percentage of the wg participants have read the draft.

Thanks,

Marc & Roger

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email