IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04

James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> Wed, 30 July 2014 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF41C1B2A47 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ef9Y1G-v2tBA for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9801B2A43 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id lj1so618400pab.33 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=rwTGhoILEoVms001UTQvAMKX1ACOgEQe79bQDhJ0kgM=; b=aCGbTons1ch036mN8SWluLdn+qyeipEvK6qLz1yQSiJZqpIW3Kd6gEJ6A1TaLUK07e 03aV4cjdwT+Ifbz/HncleACQp/nYNbVqdWq3zYs/AMuGoytF09TT4LuNjMvbNEPZfSkC nZ0THW99sBqKnlNSOf1L5QyI6+FhOKkm1VYt5YbVsxU34S0QrLo8ay1IzPqXqRvpBgXj RFJ3iYbUFuzoNwPLXi0Il2bdr05DaAP0d9XkpkbnqFTKaIJ3Ok+y570VU3r622PBIUOS q91wvszYvVzkXcM+O8PkSlnlsdY/WUeqghdSPMM+cbhzMzUPAEG6Lif1BvAW6wGrcgqK zyJw==
X-Received: by 10.70.64.225 with SMTP id r1mr117101pds.167.1406685926205; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([120.159.24.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qf3sm893444pdb.60.2014.07.29.19.05.23 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_958E4EEE-71D6-4480-84DC-C1A66DD12D88"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLU406-EAS3619AA5A34291322F577B6C93F90@phx.gbl>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:05:17 +1000
Message-Id: <1114AFF3-AC52-4F91-95F0-23312F16A83B@gmail.com>
References: <CFFBC6E2.5D512%mlinsner@cisco.com> <3B7C55D6-CE28-4B95-80D2-11AA101C53C2@gmail.com> <BLU406-EAS3619AA5A34291322F577B6C93F90@phx.gbl>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/XAm5FnvDkMx7p3LTjwRTuhzutpc
Cc: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:05:29 -0000

The only thing we have the ES 203 178 which is in draft outlining the ESTI M/493 functional architecture.
The stage-3 work isn’t generally open, but this method is currently list front runner.

Would you like me to see if I can get ETSI to send an LS?
This may take a couple of weeks because I think that many people from the WG are currently in leave.

Cheers
James




On 30 Jul 2014, at 12:01 pm, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I would also favor #1, based on my understanding of current deployment plans.
> 
> BTW, do we have a liaisons from SDOs saying they would use this? If not, can the ECRIT WG send liaisons asking if it would be used? 
> 
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 1:30 PM, "James Winterbottom" <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I am going for #1.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:22 pm, Marc Linsner (mlinsner) <mlinsner@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> This draft was presented in a compressed time slot at the Toronto meeting last week.  James W. has indicated an urgency to move this work forward.  The chairs are asking everyone to review this from the perspective of adopting this draft as a wg item.  So, please review this from the overall architectural value of providing emergency call routing within a HELD req/response (protocol details and word smithing can be done after it becomes a wg item).
>>> 
>>> Since James has indicated this work will be used by other SDOs, and coupled with the stated urgency, the chairs request that you review the draft and indicate to the list by COB Wednesday August 6, 2014 your opinion:
>>> I believe this work should move forward in ECRIT
>>> I’m agnostic to this work and don’t care either way
>>> I’m opposed to this architectural change to the ECRIT model and believe this work should not be adopted.
>>> 
>>> A indication of #2 tells the chairs that you are aware of the work and truly don’t have an opinion, it helps us in determining what percentage of the wg participants have read the draft.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Marc & Roger
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ecrit mailing list
>>> Ecrit@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ecrit mailing list
>> Ecrit@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> <Mail Attachment.txt>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email