IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04

"Marc Linsner (mlinsner)" <mlinsner@cisco.com> Wed, 30 July 2014 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mlinsner@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177611A001E for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 05:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VPhrkW593RUF for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 05:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05E241A000B for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 05:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1609; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406724095; x=1407933695; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=DFKaHpbkhPsjHocBDogTvlQKq7u96mWVufmBLm5ugoQ=; b=KmuYuiswIIXe9CiXXPsZMYbnIwDWDQxuTvYQQmi1FTzDDSSDTJ4JtRk7 SJOM6Dpu2qHbCU1FrkBoZmZgbKj7/VY6IE5KHKLgxWuJVrpMYZIOSThPS Umv1jGKEXso/IrjH0XPZWtKiyYXnK0/bK3z/rzg4DC6eo02yFjha+Rw/e E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwFADXn2FOtJV2R/2dsb2JhbABZgkdHgS3TAwGBDxZ3g3oKAQEEeRACAQgDAUIyJQIEAQ2IR8AiF49MB4RKAQSbZJRTg0mCMQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,764,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217";a="343861644"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2014 12:41:34 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6UCfYaf028512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:41:34 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.152]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:41:34 -0500
From: "Marc Linsner (mlinsner)" <mlinsner@cisco.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
Thread-Index: AQHPqmcDQBOWz8idXUOAditSmLV3Jpu2RG4AgAHu+ACAAAEIgIAAAO8AgABtxYA=
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:41:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CFFE5FF8.5D771%mlinsner@cisco.com>
References: <CFFBC6E2.5D512%mlinsner@cisco.com> <3B7C55D6-CE28-4B95-80D2-11AA101C53C2@gmail.com> <BLU406-EAS3619AA5A34291322F577B6C93F90@phx.gbl> <1114AFF3-AC52-4F91-95F0-23312F16A83B@gmail.com> <BLU406-EAS3391460A422EF3051F03E8493F90@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU406-EAS3391460A422EF3051F03E8493F90@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.248.165]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CFFE5FF85D771mlinsnerciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/VTR1w-YrCnT2t6g97wbs0Kg4i-Q
Cc: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:41:36 -0000


Confirmation that SDOs would use the proposed work (and that they would prefer it to alternatives) would be helpful. And that would apply beyond ETSI if there are other SDOs in the same boat.

+1 from the wg chairs POV also!

-Marc-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email