IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04

"DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com> Wed, 30 July 2014 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <md3135@att.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467B51A016D for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bi101frMkkyh for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 949751A00A7 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) with ESMTP id e1609d35.2aeb4d441940.131032.00-2482.369424.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <md3135@att.com>); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:50:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 53d9061e4d9423d0-78d60d1a90eec754ea099218c4f8470ad4d06950
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 31609d35.0.130918.00-2169.369127.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <md3135@att.com>); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:49:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 53d90614409b7754-99eee4e1a8fb0446000c048c1f5f145ac8f0be98
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6UEo1MX010520; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:50:02 -0400
Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6UEnt4h010380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:49:57 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.149]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:49:46 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.2.50]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:49:46 -0400
From: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>, "Marc Linsner (mlinsner)" <mlinsner@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
Thread-Index: AQHPrAMF/8htkPjEEkOQKe82SbAUUpu4slSA
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:49:45 +0000
Message-ID: <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E83656031917A7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <CFFBC6E2.5D512%mlinsner@cisco.com> <CACWXZj2BdozXJUcgD36+Ywv02pMH0GabmYFGQhmv-R=ybV-isA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACWXZj2BdozXJUcgD36+Ywv02pMH0GabmYFGQhmv-R=ybV-isA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.175.81.106]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E83656031917A7MISOUT7MSGUSRDB_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=U/kl+5Xu c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=NX6IKKGed2YA:10 a=BuP23OHSGpEA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=VHm]
X-AnalysisOut: [NBksX17gA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32R]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=avFN9Llz0vSBe5q]
X-AnalysisOut: [dTE4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=JfD0Fch1gWkA]
X-AnalysisOut: [:10 a=Mgs_jRke6sl28j_Q:21 a=oPcTfeIpcbYC2JZ_:21 a=yMhMjlub]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=jFyeaTpflAGWTO0f5_0A:9 a=gKO2Hq4]
X-AnalysisOut: [RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hU]
X-AnalysisOut: [A:10 a=tXsnliwV7b4A:10 a=UjqNRVz0_LTPrihA:21 a=IBFR7Few_wA]
X-AnalysisOut: [CcaP6:21 a=wnXaEOkedJkARkL8:21]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <md3135@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/u5dbMUDpvRDS_lbbMAxp6S1TEfc
Cc: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:50:50 -0000

+1 for option #1

From: Ecrit [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Laura Liess
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:32 AM
To: Marc Linsner (mlinsner)
Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04

I support #1 because LOST is not going to be deployed in some European countries.
Additionaly, in countries with multiple  emergency services providers, the proposal makes things easier for access network providers because they would need a trust relationship with only one emergency service provider. With LOST, they would need  trust relationships with multiple emergency service providers.

Thank you
Laura

2014-07-28 15:22 GMT+02:00 Marc Linsner (mlinsner) <mlinsner@cisco.com<mailto:mlinsner@cisco.com>>:
All,

This draft was presented in a compressed time slot at the Toronto meeting last week.  James W. has indicated an urgency to move this work forward.  The chairs are asking everyone to review this from the perspective of adopting this draft as a wg item.  So, please review this from the overall architectural value of providing emergency call routing within a HELD req/response (protocol details and word smithing can be done after it becomes a wg item).

Since James has indicated this work will be used by other SDOs, and coupled with the stated urgency, the chairs request that you review the draft and indicate to the list by COB Wednesday August 6, 2014 your opinion:

  1.  I believe this work should move forward in ECRIT
  2.  I'm agnostic to this work and don't care either way
  3.  I'm opposed to this architectural change to the ECRIT model and believe this work should not be adopted.

A indication of #2 tells the chairs that you are aware of the work and truly don't have an opinion, it helps us in determining what percentage of the wg participants have read the draft.

Thanks,

Marc & Roger



_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org<mailto:Ecrit@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email