Re: [edu-team] IETF 99 Tutorial Survey Results

[János Farkas <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Thank you very much for all your help with the tutorial!
Thank you for sharing the survey results!

Regards,
Janos


On 8/22/2017 10:27 PM, Alexa Morris wrote:
> Edu Team and IETF 99 Tutorial Presenters,
>
> Below please find links to the complete results from the IETF 99 tutorial surveys. Some respondents took the time to provide comments on how the tutorial might be improved and I’ve included those comments here so that we make sure to review them.
>
> 1. Newcomers Orientation
> -   16 respondents
> -    Online results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-TGBYL9T6/
> -    Ideas for improvements:
> 	*  Should also give a brief overview of the various subjects that IETF are currently covering.
> 	* Though IETF is not a "hierarchical" organization a diagram over the organization with areas, area-directors, working groups, wg-chairs, etc would be usefull to illustrate the width of the organization. Maybe also hand out some leaflet detailing the areas and briefly the working groups to give an overview of the tremendous amount of work that is being done in a wide variety of fields.
> 	*  I didn't know what to expect of some events, e.g. Bits and Bytes. Maybe in this tutorial you can promote hackathon activities, it could be useful even though this happens before, this could encourage someone to participate in hackathon in posterior meetings
> 	* Add a kind of organigram, explaining/showing the ADs and other parties of the IETF.
> 	* The what-to-do-if-harassed coverage didn't make me feel very reassured. It would help to have a clear pointer other than "look for someone with this color of tiny dot". Also the xmpp.net/directory.php link is broken.
>   
> My own thoughts on these comments:
> - Two respondents call out the desire for an organizational chart. I think the EDU team should discuss options for how to best provide this info, as clearly people are looking for it.
> - The concern about harassment is an interesting one. Perhaps we should have the Ombudsteam review the slides and provide us with some guidance. This is an important topic.
>
> 2. IRTF Overview
> -  13 respondents
> -   Online results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2JVQV9T6/
> -   Ideas to improve:
> 	*  I liked the sci to themed pictures, but most weren't relevant to the corresponding groups. I wish you described more about what each RG does.
>
> 3. DNS Privacy
> -   7 respondents
> -    Survey results at https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-PPCQ7T75/
> -    Ideas for improvement:
> 	* Nope
> 	*  More of them and in greater detail.
> 	* Get more people to see this briefing. They need to know this stuff. Presenter was excellent.
>
> 4.  IEEE 802.1 Time Sensitive Networking at IETF
> -   5 respondents
> -   Survey results at https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GPQFQ296/
> -   Ideas for improvement:
> 	* i did not like speakers switching in/out multiple times. one voice is better for smooth flow of concepts. Otherwise just divide all content so that same speaker comes in just once.
> 	* Excellent overview. Perhaps not enough time spent on the details... But the demo was great -- it drove home the industrial use case.
>