Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items

[Bob Hinden <[e-mail]>]

Done.

Bob

> On Mar 11, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Bob Hinden <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Erik,
> 
> Will do.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob
> 
>> On Mar 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> On 3/10/15 11:16 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>>> 
>>> Good.  Are there other drafts we should show in the agenda.
>> Bob,
>> 
>> Wouldn't hurt to list the draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches-00 draft in the agenda, since that might make some more folks read it before the meeting.
>> 
>> How about listing that under the DAD issues agenda slot together with draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues-01 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues-01>.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>>  Erik
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bob
>>> 
>>>>  Erik
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Bob
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 10, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 3/10/15 1:31 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>>>>> Erik,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I also noticed draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches-00 is that something you’ll want to cover?
>>>>>> I/we can mention it briefly as part of the dad-issues slot. But it is more important to gauge what the WG thinks need to be improved with DAD first. Solution discussion should wait until after that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> right now we have 15 minutes reserved for each of.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> alternatively consider it a 30 minute session that you can split whichever way you like.
>>>>>> Some text missing above. I assume the dad-issues and rs-refresh is what you meant by "each of".
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>  Erik
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 04 Mar 2015, at 2:05 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 3/3/15 6:09 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Erik,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Did you add two requests to the queue?
>>>>>>>>>> One was for draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh and a separate one for draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues?
>>>>>>>>>> Either Andrew will present the second one remotely, or I can do it on site.
>>>>>>>>> yes, thank you those are added.
>>>>>>>>> 15 minutes each. alternatively we make a design team session like we did last time?
>>>>>>>> Better to keep them separate. They are both merely(?) outgrowths of the DT work.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Erik
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:03 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they were not discussed at any depth:
>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while we determine whether this is needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - it would be good to  time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 minutes might be a reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Erik
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for agenda time to the 6man chairs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the speakers name (and email),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and how much time you need.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been actively discussed on the list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open discussion,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> please plan your presentation accordingly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft deadline for IETF92:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob & Ole
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Efficientnd-dt mailing list
>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Efficientnd-dt mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Efficientnd-dt mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt
>> 
>