Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items
Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> Wed, 04 March 2015 01:06 UTC
Return-Path: <nordmark@acm.org>
X-Original-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37EC1A89B0 for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 17:06:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j3_Fz_vu7Q6H for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 17:06:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (d.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC861A89AB for <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 17:06:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.22.227.238] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t2415vCU003392 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 17:05:57 -0800
Message-ID: <54F65A74.6090101@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 17:05:56 -0800
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
References: <86EF371E-55C4-4056-8569-B3844EE60137@employees.org> <54E4F01E.9030106@acm.org> <B3B010A5-7EE0-4898-B250-0FD931B84E97@employees.org> <54F551A3.3020707@sonic.net> <3E8B0214-FEB7-4BAB-9F13-14248B7DDBAD@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <3E8B0214-FEB7-4BAB-9F13-14248B7DDBAD@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVYPEcuW+0ARF2HJ8o01q1uADISJa2GM0cUTSc74CqRfmDfBSMSKistrgabPxHkQxjkQgohRtj5ehA2wEJrjsjyV
X-Sonic-ID: C;6mx2nQrC5BGKnL5YxQPdhw== M;qMaBnQrC5BGKnL5YxQPdhw==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/efficientnd-dt/zLSXkpFiJP5No2H3ZTjox3OPjjk>
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com>, "efficientnd-dt@ietf.org" <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items
X-BeenThere: efficientnd-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: 6man Efficient ND Design Team discussion list <efficientnd-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/efficientnd-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 01:06:02 -0000
On 3/3/15 6:09 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > Erik, > >> Did you add two requests to the queue? >> One was for draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh and a separate one for draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues? >> Either Andrew will present the second one remotely, or I can do it on site. > yes, thank you those are added. > 15 minutes each. alternatively we make a design team session like we did last time? Better to keep them separate. They are both merely(?) outgrowths of the DT work. Erik > > cheers, > Ole > >>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:03 , Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they were not discussed at any depth: >>>> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh >>>> >>>> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while we determine whether this is needed. >>>> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.) >>>> >>>> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - it would be good to time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 minutes might be a reasonable. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote: >>>>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working group. >>>>> >>>>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for agenda time to the 6man chairs. >>>>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the speakers name (and email), >>>>> and how much time you need. >>>>> >>>>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been actively discussed on the list. >>>>> >>>>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open discussion, >>>>> please plan your presentation accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting, >>>>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are unlikely to get time at the meeting. >>>>> >>>>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft deadline for IETF92: >>>>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59 >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Bob & Ole >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >>>>> ipv6@ietf.org >>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Andrew Yourtchenko
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Ole Troan
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Ole Troan
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Ole Troan
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda… Bob Hinden