IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 17 September 2019 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44563120A41 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.026, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9c3pEOHP0sDQ for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C900912099D for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id f12so10362839iog.12 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R+vppXQAnxmMOb/BWTHq3QYhRNMey+3fOst+9BesVe0=; b=Mk4/QehrqkQZ4TEL4FwQDmOII5EO2TG8PwSd+Jovq2+ptHLsMCp8dsr+eW46n55n6B +4QTw9UEiJVlJK6/VY0n0rJlTAj1jzhXI3zE5mqNzFBB+gVtmMh0Sob+dUTUUgVng45e or1hCZnTQ2XtqvJ2mJZNWFqvK8ZldVqkQmCFshYpkkTkoSgXc5t+f9VrrMf4zKlbIReQ 343lsXYWwb/cj7En8+PsI8sMwpHNlj0jAeUBrJYB/gjgBCUIali6DXmoB975GM4wCFiJ IKm+U1dxgN93fdcSAnaE3Ca0Hfxk5Qy6+yoWmSganARSl09/9+mY4zZhVAUkTUAByO6x OEbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVHKAFsE7HbQoXOH5r3kLJtii9sM0jiu/w5ycsxO5qk5ApdL+ur sJRN78/GwAzBpnxU+8fqYKL60dFGDpJ1d+L2yr8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZd4pXTbkch92SIsAgFRRxo8iuwaA8HrEG0mpxIo2ReGAg5oso9WJRd7VUwLWIXIlHUXcnJC1pVkTgpYklWx0=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:91da:: with SMTP id k26mr496532ior.90.1568748888963; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+BEoDd5aas9VfAmfcF+H_54w4ETNafVwFAObhY_A2v-Q@mail.gmail.com> <C90E6D6D-D058-40A5-AA3B-2D2002077016@episteme.net> <CALaySJJggQqYhVHSdKCx4BvpiR31oodx9C9NkzfMoFGbUv+gmg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKxbwYXnE7gcgwmuBUWg_Q+QSx-yYtTCOLoQesB6JLojg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJh7zvuuuxcs-kE=LaaZP1aXiaT3HpQ30tt4DNOMMP0oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMrnPv9AMhQgv4ciq2DypyB_rkqdwNkyuXgNqyHVGcpzQ@mail.gmail.com> <03d701d56d8d$5849b720$08dd2560$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBMyzwXu+=w511aJcOPEu1CJ7PqSfyq3y6ya+j0DPQkSVg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMyzwXu+=w511aJcOPEu1CJ7PqSfyq3y6ya+j0DPQkSVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:34:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+nFvYtO73TNCaMAASdoh0zHgv7f6EVKZ4gLvYZJvh_DQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/9_r8-XScaT68ZewY8_yls9Es17U>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:34:51 -0000

> They may be facts, but that doesn't mean they are problems.

Indeed, and this will work as IETF work always does:

- Some people have raised the issues that I put in my message, and
they consider these to be problems that have to be addressed.

- We will discuss them and decide whether we have rough consensus that
they *do* need to be addressed, and if so, whether we can come to
rough consensus on how.

- If we do not have rough consensus to "fix" them, we won't.  If we
do, we will do our best to.

Are there any issues with that process?

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email