IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C68E1200BA for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xie4eZ_xkbn for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDCB51208D6 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id f5so802380ljg.8 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=flWMGfUb2cwVfegStoqzytLMhWuJma/tmTFOFfsDuLE=; b=v/2w0FbDQKbofWNk0XiUye4y7yGVo2izqcjDSNNmRPUX0WFHStdto7T7PDPtIGJRPg IZttmCckfZFp9pj7hUd4FFvsm1eyFhnKibI9551qCnTvCEyu4CeSpCIMafaNY3nGCObo 11FdJkPT/ubiX6on3/Z/C4AEjv0VYuDvxxpIpn/NEZAcloBLPnwbjqTZDdf3t5/FwlSQ JWj7jVj+YF6WduNVuX4fuxVY0z+I5bONPbQ7gWiayRIra0WByWNg5XARc1emWEq3vNBr iGtZkhS8Hp528oqB3p9HhLjARmNdTwZKXKcK0fRaiin6AP2uVUQX+19bNcPqOhylqbyw X2ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=flWMGfUb2cwVfegStoqzytLMhWuJma/tmTFOFfsDuLE=; b=lItVEXqeAoUk89T2v8T0Ra4CVr5ytcy24zGyLoYnnh+XF5bMJDc9zsDjP4a7tLpMB2 6vxx3S+qSDXcJJP1xqutM4FRE1GZsLEqlezH7lkprz6fg2Ys4xYm8ehwYAnyJg/OWGFD 3klj8Y5v3wFFTZyH3ruEg6/kqshle2lUAxIxu2Shi8hXcUYPY9AHRp/cmTZYipjAbXLS 92p6chS5fEjYZF6P/qnFQ0qYYoM/fUlD08ABjoXbCjkzhgNGRbf7WCPITr/RHTMPVllZ I4sLA1xkkKfhc8aCikDoqRWeSm4PAZ1aO4H1idWLniyhS1GqXDEN8Mh5rAxQ3dw+LPZo iyeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVeAqRCGUGtzsR4YeTVSr6o4tn65f0P605Sp5jZHahiIe/+HqpJ PjYkzFauFu9x2v1b/3BJCJig/WxqaQwM7bG+MV4epw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy+Q8oTDTprtG99nxcsXl/U77omck4Db875M5ee2K97aqYHa+jAg+NqHNUe55R40+2L5Rk7abHgA4NnFjquXkk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9750:: with SMTP id f16mr2966610ljj.239.1568829059892; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+BEoDd5aas9VfAmfcF+H_54w4ETNafVwFAObhY_A2v-Q@mail.gmail.com> <C90E6D6D-D058-40A5-AA3B-2D2002077016@episteme.net> <CALaySJJggQqYhVHSdKCx4BvpiR31oodx9C9NkzfMoFGbUv+gmg@mail.gmail.com> <939D2A7C64A58595AD2B9CBD@PSB> <CABcZeBNxVgJE=jv7+Zf6RjkG3r-+00zuMQ=2mtESrP4skkPgzQ@mail.gmail.com> <4A244E1EFA8D1821D2D49ABD@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <4A244E1EFA8D1821D2D49ABD@PSB>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:50:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNmT2ONMacUiVsjUuR=cHz=fAog3ojNuhrD7P0eqQbOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d41ec50592d77a8f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/Twg80hJEjz-fmVO33aRa2dyqTMk>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:51:07 -0000

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:24 AM John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
. Recalls are the

> community's only socially-acceptable way of removing someone who
> has exhibited a consistent pattern of unacceptably bad behavior,
> whether it is demonstrated through particular decisions or not.
>

This seems like a rather odd claim, given that we have any number of worked
examples of people being successfully removed by the ordinary nomcom
process.

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email