Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Draft meeting minutes

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the notes. Sorry I wasn't on the call because time zone.

On 30-Oct-19 04:20, Pete Resnick wrote:
...
> While the question was raised as to whether equity was a problem worth 
> solving, it did not appear to garner much support and appeared to be 
> squarely in the rough in the meeting.

I had to read that twice to conclude that it means that the consensus
was that equity is a problem worth solving.
 
...> A major issue with draft-moonesamy-recall-rev was whether opening up the 
> recall petition process to remote attendees would expose the IETF to a 
> DoS attack (gaming the system) due to unfounded petitions.

I've been thinking for some days that perhaps a committee of two, say the
ISOC President and the current NomCom Chair, would be able to declare
that a received recall petition is frivolous and simply dismiss it. As long
as this was a public process, I think it would be reasonable.

   Brian