Re: [Eligibility-discuss] some numbers

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 23 April 2020 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5A13A0C85 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d27jmWLX5s2L for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AF43A0C39 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.108.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 03NGvxkc001820 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1587661090; x=1587747490; i=@elandsys.com; bh=SgtAu73mDSvvtj2yGVpwdIPkHiE/D1MXvukNWpxqGxA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=P1jCRLA2m6zgi1y6oKDHz1zQ+ZR8coUIpMRedlxtkyeDNbY+eidTIo44KR1hF9i61 Ja8uLU4im3hbMCtkFlZLSjnxvuuB//IacDqvWa2m+E+79V6Ys+CmXcrOem8YeiiD+W k1u8bHN10bin8z6DH51N05pqNMS+2mg4EIS1y9c4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200423095144.127742c8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:57:08 -0700
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <B63F5949-790C-45E9-95A1-6558E59D66CD@akamai.com>
References: <1f887326-339d-078f-e718-71ca090f762c@cs.tcd.ie> <C5D4414C-80C8-465A-AF5A-9485BE748BFA@fugue.com> <63a8511a-f727-d0e8-b3ce-6c81ac547eec@cs.tcd.ie> <2FFA69FB-D429-4C5E-B504-2E34EE4E647A@fugue.com> <0fc1f65f-8df7-0844-001d-048a310ff152@cs.tcd.ie> <BDD6E023-D24D-4AB2-AC6D-7F833AB84362@fugue.com> <AAC34EB5-7B73-4919-BAE7-558A9B769BB1@episteme.net> <B3613171-4D45-456D-A7F0-9CF0FF75C479@fugue.com> <c80ef5f9-1ce1-eadc-0f3a-3f85abe33ab8@gmail.com> <19212.1587602020@localhost> <fd65943d-8b2b-bd1d-564f-bc16bcf9e8fa@nostrum.com> <B63F5949-790C-45E9-95A1-6558E59D66CD@akamai.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/fgJZTwPMnOOjtVZZ8Mb261cE1kY>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] some numbers
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:58:17 -0000

Hello,
At 09:25 AM 23-04-2020, Salz, Rich wrote:
>The bluesheets serve two purposes: capacity planning for later 
>IETF's, and perhaps fodder for IPR legal actions.  In the first, the 
>name doesn't matter as long as only physical attendees sign. In the 
>second, someone might try to hide/dissemble their email to claim 
>that they weren't there, but the legal process has steps to (try to) 
>find out the facts of the matter.

If the "blue sheets" are used for capacity planning, it does not make 
sense to publish them.  If the purpose is for legal action, there 
isn't a need to publish them given that subpoenas are generally used 
for legal actions.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy