Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #8: Need a registry of header fields that are Ok to add after submission

Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com> Mon, 16 November 2020 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@linuxmagic.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E8A3A1333 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:32:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEUvxb-9WozD for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:32:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob1.cityemail.com (mail-ob1.cityemail.com [104.128.152.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E0F3A1331 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 7851 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2020 17:32:07 -0000
Received: from riddle.wizard.ca (HELO [192.168.1.55]) (michael@wizard.ca@104.128.144.8) by fe1.cityemail.com with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP (a62d8dee-2831-11eb-ada1-7bf33805d6d0); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:32:07 -0800
To: emailcore@ietf.org
References: <e64e5ab8-fe18-7708-f8bf-6c5ee60658b6@isode.com>
From: Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com>
Organization: LinuxMagic Inc.
Message-ID: <fdac91cb-1072-9a6b-2aaa-0b7a054ad756@linuxmagic.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:32:07 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e64e5ab8-fe18-7708-f8bf-6c5ee60658b6@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MagicMail-OS: Linux 3.11 and newer
X-MagicMail-UUID: a62d8dee-2831-11eb-ada1-7bf33805d6d0
X-MagicMail-Authenticated: michael@wizard.ca
X-MagicMail-SourceIP: 104.128.144.8
X-MagicMail-RegexMatch: 0
X-MagicMail-EnvelopeFrom: <michael@linuxmagic.com>
X-Archive: Yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/Dk2k0l_Z9XcExf5hIeW5JAOzpiI>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #8: Need a registry of header fields that are Ok to add after submission
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:32:09 -0000

On 2020-11-16 9:10 a.m., Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> b) I believe John asked whether this should be "First Come First Served" 
> or "Expert Review". I proposed to do the latter to make sure that 
> somebody checks that a particular header field is indeeded added during 
> relay/final delivery/both. The review process can be lightweight.

While this may be an attractive notion, it will generate critisicm if 
the IETF gets to be the 'police' of which headers are allowed.

AS well, the industry routinely starts using new headers for various 
purposes, and it isn't always feasible to wait on an 'approval' that the 
header is accepted..

While the use of X- headers appears to be no longer encouraged, that was 
a simple way for vendors to add new trial headers safely.

While this 'might' have some benefit in stopping those spammers that 
insert random headers, in the misguided belief that it will help get 
around various filtering or beysean tests, that number is relatively low.

There are a lot more proprietary headers out there, only used by a 
single vendor..

I don't think this is a 'cut and dried' benefit, so yes, it should 
undergo at length discussions..

And there will always be some in the industry that might be concerned 
that the 'Expert Review' might have some prejudicial positions, whether 
true or not.  The only problem with first come/first serve, is that this 
would open the door to abuse, as well becoming a very large list.

My thoughts..


-- 
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.