Re: [Emailcore] Two extra issues

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 17 December 2020 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE483A100C for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:54:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=UjoHwVOH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=PdvuSlfz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ldriy55sFY-b for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:54:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B103A100A for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:54:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 125 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2020 20:54:14 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7b.5fdbc576.k2012; bh=LjHwLrKPBS038eRppbH6hQeOiXeIN/AxfHJ8xE92/7Q=; b=UjoHwVOHCFJT13EEI30Lvo4flnMHwEDwYO7bN3huhrLHjHtVw+KZGhp3TufDCw8tHye4oBwQb/BKeHqvbmHaXTe7bYaOK6BqsIdK0KzOdHK7zBuRGd+4W3GeLaogoWZsg6rJX/C9rXZryxvMsyQ0Dju2w6lFreJV/6NEt77L2tyA42RlL88z/C6CjOxySCqUDw5b/UqmKs+GGbXHkFvo3eE0E+stcUo3ouRrgJ3pmYiNz/SSzl2AoB1wWXTqvWcSB5ORbrMVk5Ud/9p39kyl2JBobMXLrggrqOHJwNcFWur7fvTRH9dGnEOSt0lu0C5pKDRqW+9eNwkmPKiWB9TZoQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7b.5fdbc576.k2012; bh=LjHwLrKPBS038eRppbH6hQeOiXeIN/AxfHJ8xE92/7Q=; b=PdvuSlfzWzbGFdc9Xlx0rLU24/k73BWVqceWtIJMNYibi3TIWrt9Qe56IWVAN/ioRzgHoAHk3sl2UdIFVO8BBCqhJqbIlz8bZUeB9/+zoKX93eN0Gsvaj5flCLBIm6oqsFZheU1Vfab2fqBFPQNO7Chv9rzHbKMdwMTHZW62JragiLDfSi6+t/tGsKeLfSO2BYGXHMhs3ZZo4cPZ12O/omSE1DAOSnaxX2866+rgDte7rkktTFaD9TRvg8qZo11CVOjFnREXItyop/tuB2l7YmNxwN3HiAt/LklVDq2n7wlznd7fgirGzIHtpGF75zV9tDHzkzytWDQyiU4GlkRuAA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 17 Dec 2020 20:54:14 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id D68C32AC973F; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:54:13 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:54:13 -0500
Message-Id: <20201217205413.D68C32AC973F@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
Cc: john-ietf@jck.com
In-Reply-To: <9ABCA62E3E54C4356D09E1EE@PSB>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/i2fIBCKJ4TEYg4xwkqxTxu_fmik>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Two extra issues
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:54:18 -0000

In article <9ABCA62E3E54C4356D09E1EE@PSB> you write:
>Hi.
>
>As mentioned in my note about ticket #2 sent about an hour ago,
>two additional issues came to my attention (or I was reminded
>about them) while looking at that issue and looking through the
>document.  
>
>I've put them into the working version of what will become
>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-01 as:
>
>       ----
>
> G.12.  Extension Keywords Starting in 'X-'

Kill them.

> G.13.  Deprecating HELO

>   discussion on the EMAILCORE list, should EHLO be explicitly bound to
>   SMTP over TCP with the older transports allowed only with HELO?

I am pretty sure that all of the other transports described in RFC 821
are dead, or close enough (X.25, where it says to run TCP over it.)

Is anyone here aware of running SMTP over anything else, and if so
using HELO rather than EHLO? I'm not.

R's,
John