IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emailcore] Two extra issues

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 18 December 2020 01:24 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32943A0D74 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:24:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Om6xkRvb; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=S8Q21Lpa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DyhJ6prqmnkv for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:24:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 273403A0B37 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 53300 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2020 01:24:27 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=d032.5fdc04cb.k2012; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=euCLwIHoVPEElWe4AU5GtsDtON8y/P00EZp4GP0NwrE=; b=Om6xkRvbwcTaKHLJRHGdA5/aGqZSVnTH5yO17V9QkEZplYgRvTnXWBEkectyKOvQpPlLERQ7IPQzLLNkZ7nhZDbItX/rhx/gyNfOWG/nO4+R0V39tEPB96BTZKrclfar4v3VOxDBjU3BC+jM+sHq5CAEKhvzylIR5S4hO2MAMKTBcJNwiZJJfBlx1kIIC7U5jzmxat+5kZNbAo+NfFoUWyJA53YAMlgsi31KV7iEJ4vynILyCMEKt7GX8ERccjzcE45LfeflOk5GLAkangBMXD6Vd5TxMsFq1S7GpONtMTr0HzrIP9VZ/VrX2D1rmioWVZsTKeFmzfa3T266AKnmQQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=d032.5fdc04cb.k2012; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=euCLwIHoVPEElWe4AU5GtsDtON8y/P00EZp4GP0NwrE=; b=S8Q21LpaXtsJfNTCQU8pKSxMGomX5t5fAB/5WgUOFXNxLw/r57ozg8Tr9im2rAP/lwurH+lXAy0JLvQZuTe+e1nnEfSOG/8Eq8H0P/MvxOaMWgsAWd4yXXDlNi8YwKpu2D0d4wS++ZTpL3SEuF4ksj8yF04j2MutxGzOIk0zDJIsgeQ4ec1idkbQgP2D2qSynzepUTsMU2kVwz7iVDdujKXB054es0JqEXHxmzHgCDibs9Seuv4IocGHkEEEz9yl1LETSN7F58ZkqsQ0hV5FGysZAcBCf0w805AdRDpLR76Ja22jJqhS8kCDc86G+ICXOlUVrO4tWwW43l11DFikCw==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 18 Dec 2020 01:24:26 -0000
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:24:26 -0500
Message-ID: <43b5a838-c94b-7690-c62f-8ef69aeb338@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Cc: emailcore@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <01RTABPBJB7C004QVR@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <9ABCA62E3E54C4356D09E1EE@PSB> <20201217205413.D68C32AC973F@ary.qy> <01RTABPBJB7C004QVR@mauve.mrochek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/qjdfeHMJOEMkRr_rWKg210MHJB4>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Two extra issues
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:24:38 -0000

On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Ned Freed wrote:
> There's still quite a few HELO's being sent by IOT stuff that supports email.
> And I can understand why - when every byte counts, code to fall back from EHLO
> to HELO isn't going to be written.

Is that SMTP or submission?  I think we will continue to tolerate a lot 
more sloppiness in submission than in SMTP relay.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email