IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eman] EMAN-REQ: the notion of importance

Juergen Quittek <Quittek@neclab.eu> Mon, 27 February 2012 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Quittek@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551EF21F8680 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:01:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VwTWDLtd8sD1 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:01:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E40F21F867E for <eman@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:01:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DB0280001CE; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:01:48 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id be2Q8ShOskjQ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:01:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from METHONE.office.hd (Methone.office.hd [192.168.24.54]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A737028000084; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:01:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from DAPHNIS.office.hd ([169.254.2.41]) by METHONE.office.hd ([192.168.24.54]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:22 +0100
From: Juergen Quittek <Quittek@neclab.eu>
To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [eman] EMAN-REQ: the notion of importance
Thread-Index: AQHM9WjqcuO6+momUkCzpVZw8Ajs6A==
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:00:24 +0000
Message-ID: <CB71663F.438D0%quittek@neclab.eu>
In-Reply-To: <CAN40gStVGSzSg5PctnTX1HwwpabkWUGwcerLj70xhL_-C6tWmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
x-originating-ip: [10.7.0.92]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <30A8AFFD9435DB4197792B5C7CB1DC22@office.hd>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eman] EMAN-REQ: the notion of importance
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:01:50 -0000

+1

Juergen


On 27.02.12 14:29, "Ira McDonald" <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Benoit,
>
>That quote equates "powered entity's role" with "importance".
>
>This sounds largely useless and subjective.
>
>There seems to be no interest in having standardized "role"
>values in the EMAN community (and I'm not sure it's a
>tractable problem, anyway).
>
>How about dropping the "importance" terminology entirely
>and sticking to "role as an energy consumer"?
>
>Cheers,
>- Ira
>
>Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
>Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
>Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
>Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
>Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
>Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
>IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
>Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
>http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
>mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com
>Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
>Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
>
>
>
>On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>
>  
>
>    
>  
>  
>    Dear all, 
>    
>    There is a discussion amongst the "EMAN requirements" authors right
>    now about the notion of importance.
>    We're trying to evaluate the requirements related to the
>    "importance".
>    
>    The current
>      draft version
><http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eman-requirements-05> only
>mentions:
>    
>    5.1.2.  Context information on powered entities   The energy
>management standard must provide means for retrieving and
>   reporting context information on powered entities, for example, tags
>   associated with a powered entity that indicate the powered entity's
>   role, or importance.
>    
>    So there are no justifications why the importance is required.
>    The people who want this, please provide some more
>    text/justifications
>    
>    Some extra questions:
>    - Is this importance specific to EMAN or is this generic also for
>    non Energy Objects?
>    - Importance is important related to ...?
>    
>    Regards, Benoit (as a contributor for the EMAN-REQ)
>    
>    
>    
>  
>
>_______________________________________________
>eman mailing list
>eman@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>eman mailing list
>eman@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email