Re: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State MIB
Subrahmanya Hegde <subrah@cisco.com> Sat, 07 February 2004 17:19 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA09071 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 12:19:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ApW6e-0002kU-VZ; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 12:19:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ApW6G-0002jw-6M for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 12:18:36 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA09051 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 12:18:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ApW6E-00053T-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 12:18:34 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ApW5G-0004zN-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 12:17:35 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ApW4K-0004sh-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 12:16:36 -0500
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2004 09:22:54 +0000
Received: from mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com [171.71.163.17]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i17HG3Gv029378; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 09:16:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cisco.com (sjc-vpn2-436.cisco.com [10.21.113.180]) by mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AQS45042; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 09:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <40251D53.8010406@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 09:16:03 -0800
From: Subrahmanya Hegde <subrah@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
CC: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>, entmib@ietf.org
Subject: Re: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State MIB
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155028EC564@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155028EC564@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050806010806010604000203"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Agree with you
SUbra
Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>>Following comments were sent on 1/11/2004: But it is not
>>taken care in the latest draft.
>>Hoping some one is carrying as part of Editorial fix
>>******
>>a Minor Suggestion:
>>
>>Instead of having these OID definitions:
>>
>>-- Notifications
>>
>> entStateTraps OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 2 }
>> entStateTrapPrefix OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entStateTraps 0 }
>>
>>
>>We can have
>>entStateNotifs OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 0 }
>>
>>and use 'entStateNotifs' in the corresponding NOTIFICATION-TYPE
>>
>>Reason we would like to avoid name 'Traps' is: Latest RFCs refer them
>>as Notifications
>>
>>Also, above OID tree structure will be inline with mib review
>>guidelines document: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02.txt
>>
>>
>>
>
>I agree with that ... and I would even say:
>
> entStateNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 0 }
>
>Why make the descriptor more cryptic than needed?
>
>Bert
>
>_______________________________________________
>Entmib mailing list
>Entmib@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
>
>
>
- REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State MIB Margaret Wasserman
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Andy Bierman
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Andy Bierman
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Sharon Chisholm
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Sharon Chisholm
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Margaret Wasserman
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Subrahmanya Hegde
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Subrahmanya Hegde
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Margaret Wasserman
- RE: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Andy Bierman
- Re: REMINDER: [Entmib] WG Last Call: Entity State… Juergen Schoenwaelder