RE: [Entmib] Re: Entity mib support for tcif

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 10 February 2004 20:06 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA06573 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:06:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqe8v-0002b7-MZ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:06:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqe8B-0002Bx-DY for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:05:15 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA06401 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:05:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqe88-0001td-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:05:12 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqe7J-0001nU-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:04:22 -0500
Received: from tiere.net.avaya.com ([198.152.12.100]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqe6p-0001gU-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:03:51 -0500
Received: from tiere.net.avaya.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiere.net.avaya.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i1AK2uvU010918 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:02:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com (h135-64-105-51.avaya.com [135.64.105.51]) by tiere.net.avaya.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i1AK2svU010879 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:02:55 -0500 (EST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Entmib] Re: Entity mib support for tcif
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:03:44 +0200
Message-ID: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B25A7@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Thread-Topic: [Entmib] Re: Entity mib support for tcif
Thread-Index: AcPv95EnEUnJZLjNSaK806xXZxW+UgAGNiUw
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com>, entmib@ietf.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Kaj,

I was among the ones who supported doing this work. I did not change my mind.

Two comments:
1. I would like the title of the document to be more explicit about what is really provided by this MIB. 'Supplemental' is really too generic a title - what about something like 'Entity MIB Extensions for manufacturing and physical modules identification'?
2. Some of the concerns expressed in the meeting (not by me) were related to the availability and the proprietary nature of the CLEI codes. Can you comment on these? Are the documents mentioned in the REFERENCE clause of the cleiCode object freely available?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: entmib-admin@ietf.org [mailto:entmib-admin@ietf.org]On 
> Behalf Of Kaj Tesink
> Sent: 10 February, 2004 6:48 PM
> To: entmib@ietf.org
> Subject: Fwd: [Entmib] Re: Entity mib support for tcif
> 
> 
> all,
> 
> the draft i sent to the list last week is now available at
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tesink-entity-supplm
> ib-00.txt
> 
> pl note that the file name was changed (my error).
> in order to move this forward the WG would need
> to accept this as a formal work item.
> 
> so we'd appreciate comments on
> a) whether there is support/objection to do this work
> b) any technical comments
> while the minneapolis meeting already indicated some
> tentative support, restating this or any new/additional
> views would be helpful
> 
> kaj
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >X-Sender: kaj@128.96.81.11
> >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
> >Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:06:54 -0500
> >To: entmib@ietf.org
> >From: Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com>
> >
> >
> >all,
> >
> >attached is the supplemental entity miblet
> >discussed a while ago, supporting
> >- manufacturing date
> >- additional entity info
> >the latter uses the method proposed by dave
> >to convey information such as CLEIs.
> >i do recall that there were some different
> >views on whether to use an opaque encoding
> >method versus using a dedicated object, but
> >please read it over and provide any comments.
> >
> >kaj
> 

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib