Re: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service' to Proposed Standard

At 11:50 AM 2/7/2005, lconroy wrote:
Hi Scott, Richard, folks,
 Me too :)
With this single change, I think they're good drafts and will be a useful 
addition to the RFC pantheon.

I'd also prefer ldap, as the other <type>:<subtype> proposals have had the 
generated URI scheme as the sub-type. Thus my preference is for::
Enumservice name = "vpim", type = "vpim", sub-type = "ldap", generated URI 
scheme = "ldap:"

This certainly works for me as well if Greg has no problem with it.

all the best,
  Lawrence
On 7 Feb 2005, at 14:05, Stastny Richard wrote:
So once again and officially:
I suggest or request the following change to
 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-routing-08.txt
to use instead of enumservice voice:dir
   either
enumservice vpim:ldap (best choice) or
enumservice vpim:dir

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com
ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683,  Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum