Re: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service' to Proposed Standard

So once again and officially:

I suggest or request the following change to
 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-routing-08.txt

to use instead of
enumservice voice:dir 
either 
enumservice vpim:ldap (best choice) or
enumservice vpim:dir

Rationale:
'voice' (as an Enumservice type) has already been "booked" in the VOVI
drafts.
Vovi-02 has only just expired, and we haven't yet shipped Vovi-3 only
to refresh
it as we're awaiting clarification on what the heck happened with
Vovi's last call
- this was to have taken place once we updated the draft to reflect
concerns with
Vovi-1, which we did, since which time...

As the Enumservice type 'voice' is the 'top' of the IANA tree, we can't
have two
totally different Enumservices with the same type string, even if they
have different
subtypes.

regards
Richard
PS: could anyone please crosspost to the vpim list

________________________________

Von: enum-bounces at ietf.org im Auftrag von Hollenbeck, Scott
Gesendet: Mo 07.02.2005 13:30
An: 'enum at ietf.org'
Betreff: RE: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service' to Proposed Standard 

> well you had better get your comments in now ... personally I
> dont see a
> problem with Greg's definitions.

Even better than comments would be specific suggestions or requested
changes.  These two documents have been sitting around for quite a while.  I
want to get them finished so I can close the VPIM working group.

-Scott-

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum