IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 05 March 2024 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15CFC14F6FE for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 03:54:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rbQJymOcbuAt for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 03:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78F9C14F6F5 for <extra@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 03:53:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1709639611; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=M4ABffEww6N+ya7G6gja3yt5jfH6mwvbNv9FjjT3W4I=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=bI77ZOXgETSu3n4UZTkI/HfLAg+h0HS87H69HzA1/B8MCTdcYMSeBUgrPmJFb34O6DPhaL QOstrlKKxlE5bVbRXVGO/lmlYj7gM+ckzxNyxxhlTIOQFD3f+pC2MvGUsM+RTFxqC17AIH VZVAc+fukFhxYLfqgeYjOjEUgSPe7Dg=;
Received: from [172.20.1.98] (dhcp-98.isode.net [172.20.1.98]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <ZecHugAIBZe=@waldorf.isode.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:53:30 +0000
Message-ID: <ba05762d-0138-1266-0e0f-4aebc46eee32@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:53:36 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0
To: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Cc: extra@ietf.org
References: <RT-Ticket-1360269@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-118396-1709344170-1278.1360269-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-508507-1709609384-957.1360269-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-508507-1709609589-1118.1360269-9-0@icann.org> <CAKHUCzyveoAhgtR_WYepg8PxJ9CbBLfY20hSQ-En99ZdhzfB+g@mail.gmail.com> <5a77490a-041b-ae04-8d06-ac08c618cf2d@fastmail.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <5a77490a-041b-ae04-8d06-ac08c618cf2d@fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------lpq7Enu3Y0ZBjDP1MenvbYnw"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/2JcgD-5kUSLjAhbr1_aiCGliNBk>
Subject: Re: [Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:54:06 -0000

Hi Dave,

On 05/03/2024 11:36, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I agree that the example in Section 3 incorrectly has an OK response 
> rather than the required BAD response.  As document shepherd, I missed 
> that.  I believe that this is just editorial, as the text clearly 
> states that returning BAD is a MUST, and can probably be fixed during 
> AUTH48 unless Alexey feels compelled to fix it now.
>
Well spotted. I've fixed in my copy. It should have been "BAD 
[UIDREQUIRED]".

Best Regards,

Alexey

> On 3/5/24 3:11 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>> I hate to be picky here, but the document says that UIDREQUIRED is to 
>> be returned in a tagged BAD response "as below", but the example 
>> shows a tagged OK response, making it somewhat unclear. I *think* the 
>> OK is a typo, but it makes the definition unclear.
>>
>> What do you think, Arnt?
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 03:33, David Dong via RT 
>> <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
>>
>>     Dear Arnt Gulbrandsen, Dave Cridland (cc: extra WG),
>>
>>     Apologies for the follow-up (adding Arnt); as the designated
>>     experts for the IMAP Response Codes registry, can you review the
>>     proposed registration in draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06 for us?
>>     Please see
>>
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly/
>>
>>     The due date is March 19.
>>
>>     If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for
>>     publication, we'll make the registration at:
>>
>>     https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-response-codes/
>>
>>     Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act 48
>>     hours after the first response we receive.
>>
>>     With thanks,
>>
>>     David Dong
>>     IANA Services Sr. Specialist
>>
>>     On Tue Mar 05 03:29:44 2024, david.dong wrote:
>>     > Dear Arnt Gulbrandsen, Dave Cridland (cc: extra WG),
>>     >
>>     > As the designated experts for the IMAP Response Codes registry, can
>>     > you review the proposed registration in
>>     draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-
>>     > 06 for us? Please see
>>     >
>>     > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly/
>>     >
>>     > The due date is March 19.
>>     >
>>     > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
>>     > we'll make the registration at:
>>     >
>>     > https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-response-codes/
>>     >
>>     > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act 48
>>     hours
>>     > after the first response we receive.
>>     >
>>     > With thanks,
>>     >
>>     > David Dong
>>     > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Extra mailing list
>> Extra@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra
> -- 
> Kenneth Murchison
> Senior Software Developer
> Fastmail US LLC

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email