Re: [Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Tue, 05 March 2024 11:42 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1360269@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-118396-1709344170-1278.1360269-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-508507-1709609384-957.1360269-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-508507-1709609589-1118.1360269-9-0@icann.org> <CAKHUCzyveoAhgtR_WYepg8PxJ9CbBLfY20hSQ-En99ZdhzfB+g@mail.gmail.com> <5a77490a-041b-ae04-8d06-ac08c618cf2d@fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5a77490a-041b-ae04-8d06-ac08c618cf2d@fastmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:42:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzxkjJL3GAoYOn2PtMtaBzHOLWJh1VcVM15t=eecWBbXJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, extra@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007b1f710612e8550f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/f6FBg12gNEVXcjuIWJDXcn3SZz8>
Subject: Re: [Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly
Precedence: list

On that basis, I'm fine with the response code, thanks.

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, 11:36 Ken Murchison, <murch@fastmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> I agree that the example in Section 3 incorrectly has an OK response
> rather than the required BAD response.  As document shepherd, I missed
> that.  I believe that this is just editorial, as the text clearly states
> that returning BAD is a MUST, and can probably be fixed during AUTH48
> unless Alexey feels compelled to fix it now.
>
>
> On 3/5/24 3:11 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
> I hate to be picky here, but the document says that UIDREQUIRED is to be
> returned in a tagged BAD response "as below", but the example shows a
> tagged OK response, making it somewhat unclear. I *think* the OK is a typo,
> but it makes the definition unclear.
>
> What do you think, Arnt?
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 03:33, David Dong via RT <
> drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Arnt Gulbrandsen, Dave Cridland (cc: extra WG),
>>
>> Apologies for the follow-up (adding Arnt); as the designated experts for
>> the IMAP Response Codes registry, can you review the proposed registration
>> in draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06 for us? Please see
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly/
>>
>> The due date is March 19.
>>
>> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll
>> make the registration at:
>>
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-response-codes/
>>
>> Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act 48 hours
>> after the first response we receive.
>>
>> With thanks,
>>
>> David Dong
>> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
>>
>> On Tue Mar 05 03:29:44 2024, david.dong wrote:
>> > Dear Arnt Gulbrandsen, Dave Cridland (cc: extra WG),
>> >
>> > As the designated experts for the IMAP Response Codes registry, can
>> > you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-
>> > 06 for us? Please see
>> >
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly/
>> >
>> > The due date is March 19.
>> >
>> > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
>> > we'll make the registration at:
>> >
>> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-response-codes/
>> >
>> > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act 48 hours
>> > after the first response we receive.
>> >
>> > With thanks,
>> >
>> > David Dong
>> > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Extra mailing listExtra@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra
>
> --
> Kenneth Murchison
> Senior Software Developer
> Fastmail US LLC
>
>

[Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for draft-i… David Dong via RT
Re: [Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for dra… Dave Cridland
Re: [Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for dra… Ken Murchison
Re: [Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for dra… Dave Cridland
Re: [Extra] [IANA #1360269] expert review for dra… Alexey Melnikov