Re: [Extra] Fwd: Personnel change for extra WG

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Fri, 29 March 2019 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71B0120268 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 04:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xd-A8CQ6vhDG for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 04:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52928120258 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 04:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494C4C05DF; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:11:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1553857916; bh=B6ZdeX1D+J5gqRJi4vKyJpyRSPhBc7VQqgRKhGfcTls=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gE6aTL4g1hCl/VSM8sySUGBLcI0hrPhPE39OkZBvVWHwmZsGESmUhXp8olP+vvuKh NUeDa/CviLRGGoaXrJiAfzLZOcGCb4huk03hRfthcFwH2uykiSa99NfxjOvzkoVHmf 8HVhXgJpkNvJu1Iq/yRxXVe5Bfu2/a31bKAjLFS8=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1553857915-26265-2661/9/91; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:11:55 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
Cc: extra@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:09:50 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <17b8d4e0-0ce5-4768-891c-5a7c77f19289@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <533a9f07-80c6-4cbc-b7af-fe10ce62580c@www.fastmail.com>
References: <49b87029-7cc2-4324-9d97-f7fa2b8762ce@www.fastmail.com> <25ed8a44-6fce-4778-d9cd-d732b7cb91f6@linuxmagic.com> <533a9f07-80c6-4cbc-b7af-fe10ce62580c@www.fastmail.com>
User-Agent: Trojita/0.7; Qt/5.7.1; xcb; Linux; Devuan GNU/Linux 2.0 (ascii)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/k1T5uK4i2qRbOz_zt2_56Ydpk70>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Fwd: Personnel change for extra WG
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:09:57 -0000

On Thursday 28 March 2019 17:11:24 CET, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Regarding the IMAP flags, it sounds like you are asking for the 
> $JunkRecorded flag to be standardised, as a keyword which is 
> only set on user action?

Please don't define another small collection of flags.

If anything, then please a mostly-complete registration of the flags that 
are currently in use. Like 5530, which was written in three steps: a) 
surveying b) organising the results to avoid duplications c) defining each 
item.

In this case, getting the flags that are set on gmail and fastmail should 
be enough, ordered by the number of distinct users who've set each flag, 
with a cutoff after the first 50-100. Anything that's used enough to be a 
candidate for interop/standardisation should show up in one of the two 
lists.

Arnt