Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com> Tue, 26 October 2004 02:45 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA03220 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:45:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMHY9-0007yn-OC for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:59:05 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMHJd-00048Z-4t; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:44:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMHFU-00087F-RX for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:39:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA02920 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:39:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from znx208-2-156-007.znyx.com ([208.2.156.7] helo=lotus.znyx.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMHT3-0007tK-CC for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:53:50 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([208.2.156.2]) by lotus.znyx.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with ESMTP id 2004102519421441:41767 ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:42:14 -0700
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>
To: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <04e701c4bb02$c371cb80$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0302DCB8@orsmsx408> <1098753546.1045.31.camel@jzny.localdomain> <04e701c4bb02$c371cb80$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
Organization: ZNYX Networks
Message-Id: <1098758382.1042.34.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:39:42 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 10/25/2004 07:42:14 PM, Serialize by Router on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 10/25/2004 07:42:17 PM, Serialize complete at 10/25/2004 07:42:17 PM
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, forces-protocol@ietf.org, avri@psg.com, "Putzolu, David" <david.putzolu@intel.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hadi@znyx.com
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 22:23, Wang,Weiming wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com> > Subject: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? > > > > Hormuzd, > > I will be there. > > An agenda would be nice to have. Lets start with section 6 ;-> > > Weiming I hope you can make this! > I'm very busy from the day before yesterday, till nov. 29, to meet a deadline of > a long report, but I'l still try to atend the meeting. One thing I have to > mention is, I think we should still rely more on the list for consencus rather > than conference. Obviously, I have some difficulty to catch all, and even worse > is the phone voice is rather week. The one issue i would like to clarify with you is that of the path. After my previous posting(s) - does it make sense? Do we have a disagreement? etc. I think in my list this is the biggest unresolved issue. cheers, jamal _______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
- [Forces-protocol] Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? avri
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? ram.gopal
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? avri
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M