Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?
"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Tue, 26 October 2004 02:31 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA02256 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:31:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMHKp-0007ly-Nu for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:45:24 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMH4P-0005wD-Sh; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:28:22 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMH27-0004vl-5m for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:25:59 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA01996 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:25:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMHFb-0007fk-5f for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:40:00 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 99432.341813895; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:45:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from WWM (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000089684@mail.gsu.cn>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:21:18 +0800
Message-ID: <04e701c4bb02$c371cb80$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: hadi@znyx.com, "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0302DCB8@orsmsx408> <1098753546.1045.31.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:23:21 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b431ad66d60be2d47c7bfeb879db82c
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, forces-protocol@ietf.org, avri@psg.com, "Putzolu, David" <david.putzolu@intel.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com> Subject: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? > Hormuzd, > I will be there. > An agenda would be nice to have. Lets start with section 6 ;-> > Weiming I hope you can make this! I'm very busy from the day before yesterday, till nov. 29, to meet a deadline of a long report, but I'l still try to atend the meeting. One thing I have to mention is, I think we should still rely more on the list for consencus rather than conference. Obviously, I have some difficulty to catch all, and even worse is the phone voice is rather week. Thank you. Weiming > > cheers, > jamal > > On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 16:50, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > I would propose we have a conference call this week to close on some of > > the outstanding issues. > > I think this is a good time since most of the issues are fresh in our > > minds and not all of us will be able to make it to the IETF meeting. For > > one, I will be unable to attend, so will Ram and Weiming I believe. Once > > we resolve these issues, we can submit another draft update by early > > next week. > > > > Let me know what day/time works for you. I would suggest Wed, Thu, or > > Friday early morning call my time i.e. 8 AM PST, but I will be happy to > > accommodate your times so that we can get everyone. > > > > Pls let us know soon ? > > > > > > Regards > > Hormuzd > > > _______________________________________________ > Forces-protocol mailing list > Forces-protocol@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol _______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
- [Forces-protocol] Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? avri
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? ram.gopal
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? avri
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M