Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?

"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Tue, 26 October 2004 02:59 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA03835 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:59:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMHmL-0008CQ-LY for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:13:45 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMHXm-0000Bp-Tn; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:58:42 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMHXX-0008T2-36 for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:58:27 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA03802 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:58:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMHl3-00087L-6l for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:12:29 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 99432.341813895; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:12:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from WWM (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000089769@mail.gsu.cn>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:47:50 +0800
Message-ID: <04f701c4bb06$78dcca30$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0302DCB8@orsmsx408><1098753546.1045.31.camel@jzny.localdomain><04e701c4bb02$c371cb80$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn> <1098758382.1042.34.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:49:54 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, forces-protocol@ietf.org, avri@psg.com, "Putzolu, David" <david.putzolu@intel.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465

Jamal, that is also exactly what I want to discuss with you further. I'l
response your earlier email very soon.

cheers,
weiming

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?


> On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 22:23, Wang,Weiming wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
> > Subject: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?
> >
> >
> > > Hormuzd,
> > > I will be there.
> > > An agenda would be nice to have. Lets start with section 6 ;->
> > > Weiming I hope you can make this!
> > I'm very busy from the day before yesterday, till nov. 29, to meet a
deadline of
> > a long report, but I'l still try to atend the meeting. One thing I have to
> > mention is, I think we should still rely more on the list for consencus
rather
> > than conference. Obviously, I have some difficulty to catch all, and even
worse
> > is the phone voice is rather week.
>
> The one issue i would like to clarify with you is that of the path.
> After my previous posting(s) - does it make sense? Do we have a
> disagreement? etc. I think in my list this is the biggest unresolved
> issue.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forces-protocol mailing list
> Forces-protocol@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol