Re: [ftpext] WG Action: FTP Extensions, 2nd edition (ftpext2)

[Tony Hansen <[e-mail]>]

On 11/24/2010 2:38 AM, Anthony Bryan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Tony Hansen<[e-mail]>  wrote:
>> When the next update is ready for each draft, each author should 
>> upload the
>> draft under the WG name. Bryan's naming suggestion is apropos:
>>
>> draft-bryan-ftp-hash =>  draft-ietf-ftpext2-hash
>> draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftp-hosts =>  draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts
>> draft-klensin-ftp-typeu =>  draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu
> thanks, Tony.
>
> I saw that the websocket draft, when converting from an individual's
> to a WG draft, had no changes.
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00.txt
>
> is that how most people do it, or do we wait for substantive changes?
It can be done either way. If there are changes pending for a draft at 
the same time, then it can be done as part of that update. If there are 
no pending changes, then you can either just do it or wait for changes 
to appear; it's a judgment call. (If an individual draft is in its final 
state and ready for publication, the name change is a formality that can 
be done immediately just as a matter of course.)

> there is also
> draft-liu-ftp64-extension =>  draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64 ?
>
> which after discussion during the charter, should be changed to
> "Intended status: Standards Track"

Yes.

     Tony Hansen
     [e-mail]