Re: [ftpext] WG Action: FTP Extensions, 2nd edition (ftpext2)

Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com> Wed, 24 November 2010 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB39C3A695C for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:37:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.78
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dytd4u4qT-bm for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:37:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2D43A68D3 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:37:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so5306453eyd.31 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:38:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uKCoHwLMyydTDX+xQHmX4UHqEkfewIFj89V6+DxZkAk=; b=sgFJKcX+SjVkbaRZyoHfWoELaHrl4FpSSHiKF0PWr2AIazNa4AlAH0wIKUZe/rZcCk Ij0QR4knh6xUfStRUw6cfhnsxQ+WJqipRg8LDnZ2FylqFp6GLwsl3evD3EXQL1OjxFdi gyxV3V9IXUpGY+de0smBBmKPaXWQxh6hXF+00=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=j8oPGcq+C2w8AstZlGx88ZP2aX9qwZcafvO9Sv8m4LCJM89opmgZAOyzFNRxidpxUj KefzwOCzEZ9lALDWCMUywA18I4p3Xqtx+tJkZX1acVSm6jpPdPt+DIZLrUkyjWWKfZRB uwdHkdf/aUht0vWm1S21MyGc7yV9sdVS7lW9U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.34.131 with SMTP id l3mr2817224ebd.63.1290584327083; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.28.2 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:38:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4CEC5480.8040801@att.com>
References: <20101123184835.AFC433A69A1@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTinYUc1G-syqicN31Rc+yV6UvKurB-O1nQba2Y9=@mail.gmail.com> <4CEC5480.8040801@att.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:38:47 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=hOFDdV5p8YomDmOcQH=jfFC1qt0pHhgR8LYae@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] WG Action: FTP Extensions, 2nd edition (ftpext2)
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:37:51 -0000

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 4:17 PM, Anthony Bryan wrote:
>>
>> so, wow, looks like things are rolling along! :)
>>
>> as you can see, our WG got approved last Thursday.
>>
>> I'm very happy to see comments on
>> draft-peterson-streamlined-ftp-command-extensions still coming in.
>> please chime in if you haven't already.
>>
>> I'm new to this, so I wonder what the first order of business is?
>>
>> here are some ideas:
>>
>> 1) we have 4 drafts on the charter, 3 of which are "active" (John
>> hasn't updated draft-klensin-ftp-typeu yet). once these are submitted
>> with the string '-ftpext2-' in the
>> draft name, they will show up at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ftpext2/
>>
>> I think our ID draft-bryan-ftp-hash becomes ietf-ftpext2-hash then? (&
>> the others follow in a similar fashion).
>
> When the next update is ready for each draft, each author should upload the
> draft under the WG name. Bryan's naming suggestion is apropos:
>
> draft-bryan-ftp-hash => draft-ietf-ftpext2-hash
> draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftp-hosts => draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts
> draft-klensin-ftp-typeu => draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu

thanks, Tony.

I saw that the websocket draft, when converting from an individual's
to a WG draft, had no changes.
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00.txt

is that how most people do it, or do we wait for substantive changes?

there is also
draft-liu-ftp64-extension => draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64 ?

which after discussion during the charter, should be changed to
"Intended status: Standards Track"

>> should this be done now? we should change the WG at the top of our
>> drafts I guess. how is this done in xml2rfc? is there anything else
>> that needs to be changed?
>
> This is optional: it is done by using the <workgroup> element in the <front>
> matter.

ahh, I'd been wondering!

I've changed it. we all might as well...now that we've got the WG,
time to flaunt it. :)
-- 
(( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
  )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads