Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts
liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> Tue, 19 October 2010 08:25 UTC
Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6B63A6BAE for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zqFY-zxRguHM for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35CC3A6A96 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so2481582iwn.31 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pys1x3uIhWYzYvXxQds2AqRvQLvj+HvtDUGCFnqdtk8=; b=CqzraNtGX1Y9rNHt6wxk6HAG+Zq2SI2HV42peniVVhSqayQyGx94sC3N9sIhmeQngV ALq8Y/UGrhpoo+8uKF98Rdde3svG/OlBnx8LV1VavDfFzRlymvBoNUS1PD+o6VvNvBot mC45PWTTd/UjuSzrxOBibo+xIOhd3v7/TPCJQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KXELqn6sznwaqrYlNfIrYthhbMlDnID7aDQIrEd6FUnOObIJpZaLqTiOsS+c1LhWeP cDDhAPbLRb8FlwdtSDLzoDXeOYjfkvqGiZ9qrCeghxtN3amg9uUDnNamTk0WK39fdiVc kTuN78rhpQ2oBIVCH5UnoyZOGmoPU4vbBYMQs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.20.2 with SMTP id d2mr325333ibb.135.1287476808458; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.10.211 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimFkMmNnpAWWwx9xmJzGoJCHAwqvMrOMoZ-bHZ+@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C431FD205@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010171017300.14040@iskra.ottix.net> <AANLkTimFkMmNnpAWWwx9xmJzGoJCHAwqvMrOMoZ-bHZ+@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:26:48 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTik7Ezi_ut6N=GqePfZ5VvO0gKm0z5jwk0qo=gph@mail.gmail.com>
From: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Robert McMurray <robmcm@microsoft.com>, "ftpext@ietf.org" <ftpext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:25:20 -0000
2010/10/18, Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>: > I think the problem is that there isn't a FTPEXT WG yet & it doesn't > seem definite that there will be one. > > I've been posting a draft charter (included here) but...not sure what > the next step is. > > I added draft-liu-ftp64-extension, which I just saw turn up. Thanks, Anthony, this is the split draft from draft-behave-ftp64 based on our discussion in Maastricht. Best Regards, Dapeng Liu > somewhat on topic, does anyone know how to change the WG in xml2rfc? > > > > FTP Extensions, 2nd edition (ftpext2) Charter > > Chair(s): > TBD > > IETF Area: > Applications Area > > Applications Area Directors: > Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> > Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> > > Responsible Area Director: > Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> > > Mailing list: > General Discussion: ftpext@ietf.org > Archive: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext/current/maillist.html > > Description of Working Group: > > The Standard File Transfer Protocol specification in RFC 959 > has been updated several times with command extensions of one > sort or another, including those based on the extension > mechanism of RFC 2389 (a complete list appears in RFC 5797 and > the corresponding IANA registry at > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ftp-commands-extensions/ftp-commands-extensions.xhtml > ). > > The following are active FTP related drafts: > > draft-bryan-ftp-hash > draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftp-hosts > draft-liu-ftp64-extension > draft-peterson-streamlined-ftp-command-extensions > draft-preston-ftpext-deflate > > The Working Group will: > * Review and finalize drafts listed above. > * Continue work on other drafts that are already in progress. > * Review and confirm or reject errata of current FTP RFCs. > * Investigate the differences between FTP in theory > (current RFCs) and practice, and recommend future work to align them. > > The Working Group's specification deliverables are: > * A document that specifies the HOST command (Proposed Standard). > * A document that specifies the HASH command (Proposed Standard). > * A document that specifies FTP extensions to support IPv4/IPv6 > translation scenario. > > The Working Group must not introduce a new version of FTP, e.g. > an incompatible FTP 2.0. > > Goals and Milestones > Oct 2010 Submit 'File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual > Hosts' as working group item (draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftp-hosts will be > used as a starting point) > Oct 2010 Submit 'File Transfer Protocol HASH Command for > Cryptographic Hashes' as working group item (draft-bryan-ftp-hash will > be used as a starting point) > TBD 2010 Working group Last Call of HOST document > TBD 2010 Submit 'File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual > Hosts' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > TBD 2011 Working group Last Call of HASH document > TBD 2011 Submit 'File Transfer Protocol HASH Command for > Cryptographic Hashes' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed > Standard > TBD 2011 Close or recharter > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, William F. Maton <wmaton@ottix.net> wrote: >> >> Punt it into ftpext2 please, otherwise there's not much point to having >> one. >> >> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Robert McMurray wrote: >> >>> I'd like to submit a new draft (see attached) that is unrelated to my >>> other draft - should we be using FTPEXT2 as the WG? Or should continue to >>> submit as individual drafts to the Applications Area? > > > -- > (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ] > )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads > _______________________________________________ > ftpext mailing list > ftpext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext >
- [ftpext] Submitting new drafts Robert McMurray
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts William F. Maton
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts Anthony Bryan
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts Robert McMurray
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts Anthony Bryan
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts Robert McMurray
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts liu dapeng
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts liu dapeng
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts Anthony Bryan
- Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts Anthony Bryan