Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt
Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com> Wed, 30 September 2009 10:08 UTC
Return-Path: <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9018E28C13E for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.184
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jXM5rb2xnfC for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga01-in.huawei.com (usaga01-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1853A6872 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga01-in [172.18.4.6]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KQS00IM148I05@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([144.254.117.185]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KQS00FO548F8E@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:09:21 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
Message-id: <407DF2EF9BAF465D8D5CE560DE8585C4@your029b8cecfe>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
Content-type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <200909292210.n8TMANi8020348@givry.fdupont.fr> <4AC289F3.6080607@labn.net>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be, jpv@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:08:32 -0000
Francis, Get a conformant dictionary :-) Compliant has two meanings. The most used would describe a submissive person. Conformant has the same meaning as the other meaning of compliant. Lou, were you proposing that a further change is made here? Can you handle it in Auth48? A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> To: "Francis Dupont" <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Cc: <gen-art@ietf.org>; <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>; <jpv@cisco.com>; <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:28 PM Subject: Re: review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt > okay, reasonable enough. While it is jargon, I think it is accepted in > the computer science space... > > Thanks, > Lou > > On 9/29/2009 6:10 PM, Francis Dupont wrote: >> In your previous mail you wrote: >> >> => oops, catching an old message. >> >> > - 2.2 page 6 and 2.3 page 6: conformant -> compliant >> >> Why? >> >> => just because conformant is not in my dictionary, compliant is >> and is supposed to mean the same thing... Now my dictionary is >> not universal and is British oriented (:-). >> >> Regards >> >> Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr >> >> >> >
- [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-rer… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Lou Berger
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Lou Berger
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Adrian Farrel