Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 29 September 2009 22:26 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843B03A683B for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.841
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.841 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.990, BAYES_40=-0.185, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BVdJNP7jmyMq for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-mail-30.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-30.bluehost.com [69.89.17.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 67BA33A67EB for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24620 invoked by uid 0); 29 Sep 2009 22:27:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by outboundproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 22:27:59 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=labn.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=pBPom4mX2liCHG3KP4u8KV5sdhf1y5Giug+6+kYnP3dcFcehzkNDg2HsNMSpRVS7qTlGlSpgIoccrXfpTToQFddiKygsDub+8kZU8VKSGz+fE4qI80yYdeUbe0jDB38y;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1MslAs-0008Q7-Rw; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:27:59 -0600
Message-ID: <4AC289F3.6080607@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:28:03 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090902 Eudora/3.0b3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
References: <200909292210.n8TMANi8020348@givry.fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200909292210.n8TMANi8020348@givry.fdupont.fr>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be, jpv@cisco.com, adrian.farrel@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:26:40 -0000
okay, reasonable enough. While it is jargon, I think it is accepted in the computer science space... Thanks, Lou On 9/29/2009 6:10 PM, Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > => oops, catching an old message. > > > - 2.2 page 6 and 2.3 page 6: conformant -> compliant > > Why? > > => just because conformant is not in my dictionary, compliant is > and is supposed to mean the same thing... Now my dictionary is > not universal and is British oriented (:-). > > Regards > > Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr > > >
- [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-rer… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Lou Berger
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Lou Berger
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Adrian Farrel