Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Francis,
	Much thanks for the comments.  See below for a single response.

On 9/7/2009 8:31 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
> (Oops, it seems I forgot to forward this)
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) 
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see 
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). 
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
> you may receive. 
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 2009-08-31
> IETF LC End Date: 2009-08-31
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues: none
> 
> Minor issues: none
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: 
>  - ToC page 2 and 8 page 12: Author's Addresses -> Authors' Addresses
> 
>  - 1 page 3: i.e. -> i.e.,
> 
>  - 2.1 page 4: please introduce the ERO (Explict Route Object) abbrev
>   (note the TLV abbrev is supposed to be common so doesn't need to be
>    introduced, cf
>     http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt )
> 
>  - 2.1 page 5: IF_IF -> IF_ID
> 
>  - 2.2 page 6 and 2.3 page 6: conformant -> compliant

Why?

> 
>  - 2.2 page 6: Re-routing -> re-routing
> 
>  - 2.2 page 6: is note -> is not
> 
> Note: the usage of rerouting/re-routing is not very uniform...
> 
good, catch.

Much thanks,
Lou

> Regards (and sorry for the delay)
> 
> [e-mail]
> 
> 
>