Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Tue, 29 September 2009 22:09 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068D93A685E for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.064
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.064 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcgKFtvXmYvx for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [91.121.26.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E453A67AA for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8TMANi8020348; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:10:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <200909292210.n8TMANi8020348@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:54:31 EDT. <4AA67027.5050600@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:10:23 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be, jpv@cisco.com, adrian.farrel@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:09:05 -0000
In your previous mail you wrote: => oops, catching an old message. > - 2.2 page 6 and 2.3 page 6: conformant -> compliant Why? => just because conformant is not in my dictionary, compliant is and is supposed to mean the same thing... Now my dictionary is not universal and is British oriented (:-). Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
- [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-rer… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Lou Berger
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Lou Berger
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp… Adrian Farrel