IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 23 January 2012 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8BE21F85DA for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:52:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MF5OjACCjYJu for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:52:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED3121F84CE for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bkbzt4 with SMTP id zt4so1118808bkb.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:52:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ccENhgQ/65ihKlk9Lu/CRXRJdqNKvHHlQBqqLVsh66Y=; b=GcpPdskGxEmfxKD/fS9GZlf3S4eAmU2IUEWb/JuXI79oKR8iDU5jHt93ZKeqXmdAaV 1efSoIzLImXUqaNypcVrAF3hHru/HWv9Kz+wXaqU/CZ7nM6K6JLfyCJPIRORvaCLzkWX OI7EuNILV1GSyT10AtcGMK6X/20BosyWY94jo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.154.211 with SMTP id p19mr4138510bkw.130.1327362739697; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.186.80 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.186.80 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:52:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F16EFCA.2000808@stpeter.im>
References: <CABkgnnUz-k3=WKhRedc0MPr0EoGz+NWBKNi=qGh0RdoK6tG2Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CADBvc9-m1em1=3i78B+VKUc96VK3jMwzHZpuT2WcFUCysv2Shg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU2NoLLRkMNo8+CaOWL_f=oE2T4i-uZdG5utJvCY9+WjA@mail.gmail.com> <4F16EFCA.2000808@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:52:19 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXPv0xF8E4Xo-XZe82G8y76Vx9SK+_9VNDzghSJSvdcsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015175cd13096784e04b73ab836"
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>, draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:52:22 -0000

Hi Peter,

-02 is a marked improvement over the version I reviewed.  All my concerns
were addressed.

--Martin

On Jan 18, 2012 8:14 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>
> Martin, here is my perspective...
>
> On 12/17/11 ?:46 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > "It is easy" is not an especially good reason.
>
> Martin, is there *harm* in completing these registrations via
> informational RFCs?

I don't find that reason any more compelling. How about: "this is the one
we chose and there isn't a good reason to choose either, so this will do"?
Which is probably what you meant anyhow...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email