IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Fri, 29 October 2010 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0006C3A680E for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tj8QKtBLMpuv for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2DD3A672F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id o9T2hBxD025216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:43:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (vkg.lra.lucent.com [135.244.2.115]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id o9T2hAmD024709; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:43:10 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4CCA352F.9040607@bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:45:03 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.0.7-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
References: <4CCA31F0.3080201@bell-labs.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03F31EB3B0@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03F31EB3B0@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
Cc: "draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions@tools.ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:41:38 -0000

On 10/28/2010 09:36 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
> The list of "identifiers" in RFC 5687 is longer than this allows for.
> This offers an explanation for the shortfall.  The separation of
> identity and measurement concepts came a little later.

Martin: I noticed that as well ... it is just that for someone
reading S2, the juxtaposition of measurement information with
identifiers does not quite make sense.  Maybe you can provide
some insight by a short sentence or so.  Or maybe I will re-look
at the offending section tomorrow when I am not as sleep deprived
and see if some clarifying text makes itself apparent.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email