IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05

"Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> Fri, 29 October 2010 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B183A69E7 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.861
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.861 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.262, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIi+0QqpOI10 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from csmailgw1.commscope.com (csmailgw1.commscope.com [198.135.207.244]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F1D3A69ED for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.86.20.103] ([10.86.20.103]:19177 "EHLO ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com") by csmailgw1.commscope.com with ESMTP id S36887666Ab0J2Cg2 (ORCPT <rfc822; gen-art@ietf.org>); Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:36:28 -0500
Received: from SISPE7HC2.commscope.com (10.97.4.13) by ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com (10.86.20.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.436.0; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:36:28 -0500
Received: from SISPE7MB1.commscope.com ([fe80::9d82:a492:85e3:a293]) by SISPE7HC2.commscope.com ([fe80::58c3:2447:f977:57c3%10]) with mapi; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:36:25 +0800
From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>, "draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:36:22 +0800
Thread-Topic: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05
Thread-Index: Act3ETfRRURSdErKTfevwYbqigmRAQAAG1TA
Message-ID: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03F31EB3B0@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
References: <4CCA31F0.3080201@bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CCA31F0.3080201@bell-labs.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BCN: Meridius 1000 Version 3.4 on csmailgw1.commscope.com
X-BCN-Sender: Martin.Thomson@andrew.com
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:34:40 -0000

Thanks Vijay,

On 2010-10-29 at 13:31:12, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
> NEW:
>     If device identity is present, the identity of the requester in the
>     form of the source IP address is not used to identify the subject
>     of the request.

I'll add that to the next revision, thanks.
 
> 2) S2, opening paragraph.  I am not sure why the note to differentiate
> identifiers from measurement information (maybe the WG deliberated on
> this and decided to put this text in there; if so, please disregard
> my comment.)  It seems to me that the using the IP address as an
> identifier is what causes confusion with measurement information, yes?
> The same IP can be re-assigned to another device once a DHCP lease
> is up.  If that is indeed the case, please consider making it explicit.

The list of "identifiers" in RFC 5687 is longer than this allows for.  This offers an explanation for the shortfall.  The separation of identity and measurement concepts came a little later.

Cheers,
Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email