Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06.txt

Jari: 

The authors are in California.  You will not see their response until after
the IESG meeting. 

Sue Hares
(shepherd) 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net] 
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 6:08 AM
To: Francis Dupont
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06.txt

Thanks for your review, Francis. Authors, did you see the suggested
editorial nits?

Jari

On 04 May 2016, at 09:51, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area 
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by 
> the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like 
> any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 20160429
> IETF LC End Date: 20160429
> IESG Telechat date: 20160505
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - Abstract page 1, 4.1 page 7 and 4.2.2 page 9: i.e. -> i.e.,
> 
> - ToC page 2 and 2.2 page 5: variants -> Variants
> 
> - ToC page 2 and 7 page 14: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
> 
> - 2.2 page 5: software[sacm-requirements] -> software 
> [sacm-requirements]
> 
> Regards
> 
> Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art