Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-01

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 01 October 2015 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5620D1B2C8C; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.39
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_LIST=2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mo8lfmdbR6Tq; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A911B2C97; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9AC2CEE8; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:01:42 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MiDaQ5bPWnU; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:01:42 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FA42CC6B; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:01:42 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B55E8668-5652-464C-BF37-F5B160175339"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU0xhzKkKS-c9PDxy3GDz4Ev4RiXRdOzb-RR-__KQ8idLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:01:40 +0300
Message-Id: <AA287B08-5CEF-43FA-A994-DE8E8902CB53@piuha.net>
References: <D22E72CC.136A2%peter@akayla.com> <CAA=duU0xhzKkKS-c9PDxy3GDz4Ev4RiXRdOzb-RR-__KQ8idLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/AeOpyLPwyNUeokrt7hc9ndAou5Q>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:01:52 -0000

Many thanks for your careful read, Peter!

Jari

On 28 Sep 2015, at 18:19, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Peter,
> 
> Thanks for your careful read and the detailed list of nits! I'll wait to hear back from the IESG as to whether they would prefer to see a new revision, or will pass the list of nits to the RFC Editor.
> 
> Thanks again,
> Andy
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or
> AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-01
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review Date: Sep-28-2015
> IETF LC End Date: Sep-30-2015
> IESG Telechat date: Sep-30-2015
> 
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an Informational
> RFC, but has a nit that should be fixed before publication. [Ready with
> nits]
> 
> The draft discusses requirements that apply to the expedited setup of
> GMPLS LSPs in scenarios that may have high churn.  The text can be a bit
> dense in the descriptive sections, but the requirements are easily
> understood.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits:
> 
> Page 2, Section 1, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: delete the commas
> following “setup” and “blocking”.
> 
> 
> Page 3, 1st partial paragraph, 1st full sentence: change “set up” to
> “setup”.
> 
> Page 3, 2nd full paragraph, 1st sentence: delete “intends to”.  Change
> “present” to “presents”.
> 
> Page 3, Section 2, 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: append a comma after
> “sub-wavelength”.
> 
> Page 3, Section 2, 1st paragraph, 3rd sentence: delete the comma after
> “requirements”.
> 
> Page 4, Section 3, item 2, 1st sentence: change the first “setup” to “set
> up”.
> 
> Page 4, Section 3, item 2, 3rd sentence: delete “a” before “packet-only”.
> 
> Page 4, Section 3, 2nd paragraph after items, 2nd sentence: append a comma
> after “e.g.”.
> 
> Page 5, Section 4.1, 1st paragraph: change the space after performance to
> a hyphen.
> 
> Page 5, Section 4.1, 1st item: change “rate” to “rates” and both
> occurrences of “request” to “requests”.
> 
> Page 6, Section 5, 3rd sentence: delete “be”.
> 
> Page 6, item R3: insert “the” before “number”.
> 
> Page 7, item R8: append a comma after “e.g.”.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>