[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 01:43 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF921A1A17; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:43:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4aE7ypHUx4X; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF6E1A1A25; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x232.google.com with SMTP id ur14so14722869pab.0; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:43:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z9vdElO3XfHPyP+8BqkSIi/Bm/RBoPWyP6icP654jfI=; b=ulE4n9X53zXx7XZ0vT55ijMMX3vRonEwWx5lHIOqXkzzoh0KrRjc+5Ouvzzc3L7kJW 9W6CFE40QsU+/XWBcOjmDBz8uLvVjBd1PYpwgEDD20EmzmG33k3hvrssLk/Cm3DVJQJI i8x0hzbM3ReDgN86p2O9FuRwwZlf+NwwzvkH0HOwjbWuWsbTz4Sjg6ne0tMtpQjv2Wqa Xwxyz4ADLo2Owx7ebbcL8KQ0A5zsEyJUUDToG7pg8O22kHpSj7xeAIYqMcRkQKKWw5mW MXnFOexbnXmp2kgeM2j72iJKxR1IBw/7zmTLZAWLWu66x1fS4tNzqeol6llBmY9zDzYT +rdQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.255.10 with SMTP id am10mr59408413pad.79.1450230199074; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:2006:c0da:ac17:5f6d:8e76? ([2001:df0:0:2006:c0da:ac17:5f6d:8e76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o22sm649466pfi.2.2015.12.15.17.43.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:43:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <5670C1B7.6010003@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:43:19 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/CjWABj7f0e49NY6qz5a0jzu_Sgo>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:43:21 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-12-16
IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-24
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: Almost ready
--------

Minor Issue:
------------

   We note that [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] proposes
   a method similar to [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m], and ippm-list discussion
   indicates [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] may be
   covered by the same IPR as [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m].

I suggest removing the IPR comment. It may be an issue, but not for this
draft. We generally avoid taking a position on IPR applicablity (in fact,
our lawyer tells us not to do so).