IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Tue, 15 December 2015 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12F01ACDC6; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:01:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26x7-zRRBfg4; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0134.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA4F1ACDC3; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1986.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.355.16; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:00:58 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0355.012; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:00:58 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of
Thread-Index: AdE3ejRyQmcdOK6DT0mdjMo6ZB4sXw==
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:00:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB19857D082776237DDB72919CAEEE0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbonica@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1986; 5:JuRwU8l9xVgjHR/Jad5ygJc6MjOT7kHqlh7EBxMi6nrZded/kkTj+jNRsDhPrQyPEpjWiqds/mb+9pFNeU2ID1+/ffR++IXgyiwT61mycWb1aasCL12xZMV7NL2Qm9mOi1epCrWbfMqTuZT6CNfJcA==; 24:bAcrwTWbCgm53B7436PIyGQATvf0rj5a492HuEM0GZz2bGox98wC2gxW+f5iUFDsz0N1H7tOQbf0oUdIYWjigOkSECQwB3nbCCoBQudITKQ=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1986;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB1986257D06B8A24667A9B4DEAEEE0@BLUPR05MB1986.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(520078)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1986; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1986;
x-forefront-prvs: 07915F544A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(189002)(377424004)(450100001)(2900100001)(15975445007)(5002640100001)(5001960100002)(99286002)(77096005)(101416001)(40100003)(122556002)(87936001)(105586002)(66066001)(5004730100002)(5008740100001)(107886002)(11100500001)(81156007)(5001770100001)(50986999)(106356001)(76576001)(19580395003)(54356999)(229853001)(33656002)(97736004)(74316001)(2501003)(1220700001)(3846002)(189998001)(10400500002)(586003)(102836003)(6116002)(4001150100001)(86362001)(1096002)(5003600100002)(92566002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1986; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Dec 2015 21:00:58.6644 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1986
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/iGLGlIfDKnIPgubDM6Gl8SBmuBI>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:01:04 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document:                                      draft-ietf-pals-congcons-01
Reviewer:                                        Ron Bonica
Review Date:                                  2015-12-15
IETF LC End Date:                          2015-12-15
IETF Telechat Date:                      TBD

Summary:          This document is ready for publication

In summary, draft-ietf-congcons-01:

- applies only to pseudowires that run over something other than MPLS (e.g., GRE)
- concludes that no additional mechanisms are needed for elastic pseudowires
- concludes that an inelastic pseudowire MAY shutdown when it experiences higher-than-acceptable loss, latency or jitter
- observes that that for TDM PWs, as loss rate increases, higher-than-acceptable loss generally occurs before the fixed-rate TDM PW could cause serious problems for competing congestion-responsive traffic
- Therefore, no additional mechanisms are needed for inelastic pseudowires, either

I see nothing objectionable in the draft. However, its scope is extremely limited and it conclusions are not earthshattering. Nonetheless, the work is sound and deserves publication.
                    
Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None

Editorial Issues: 

Ron Bonica

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email