Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review tool

"A. Jean Mahoney" <> Wed, 30 November 2011 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B6921F8BDE for <>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:05:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YE7gVbO91Iyg for <>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:05:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4261121F8BCB for <>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:05:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAUH54vm058152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:05:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:05:04 -0600
From: "A. Jean Mahoney" <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Elwyn Davies <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass ( is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review tool
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:05:10 -0000

Hi Elwyn,

When you enter a review URL, click Done. When a document comes back 
around, it will be added to my "Unassigned" queue, and I can assign it 
to you again for a second review.

That said, it should have come up in the "Unassigned" queue and I should 
have assigned it back to you. However, it's not in my queue nor in 
yours. So I may have clicked "Finished" too soon. I'll have to 
investigate further. Like Miguel's issue, this is probably a workflow 
error on my part.

I apologize for the late response. My machine suffered from hard drive 
failure, and I'm still not completely recovered from it.


On 11/19/11 8:14 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> Hi.
> I have processed my last call review of draft-geopriv-deref-protocol and
> updated the entry in the tool to indicate I have done the review and
> recorded the message URL.
> Now in the usual course of things the authors have fixed up a few
> things, there is a new version and I am more or less happy with the
> result.  Mails have been exchanged...
> Now it is on the agenda for the telechat and I will (probably) be
> producing a review which says "Thank you.  I am now fine with the draft.
> Go for it!" (or whatever).  So where does a reference to this go?
> Or did I press done too soon?
> Regards,
> Elwyn
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:27 -0500, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> The review tool may not have sent emails upon user creation. Even if you
>> have not received automatically generated emails from the tool, please
>> try to log in. If you have difficulties, let me know.
>> Thanks!
>> Jean
>> On 11/1/11 3:55 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> The Gen-ART review tool is ready to be tested.
>>> Users of the review tool should have received automatically generated
>>> emails starting with "[genart review tool]".
>>> Steps on accessing and working with the tool can be found here:
>>> Please log in and check the My Info page for your user information,
>>> then check the My Queue page. Most reviewers should see one or more
>>> recent assignments, which are for documents currently in Last Call
>>> and/or on the November 3 Telechat. David, Elwyn, Kathleen, and
>>> Richard: your queues are empty for the moment.
>>> If the assignment is unfamiliar to you, I've probably fumbled
>>> something. Please reject the assignment. Otherwise, accept the
>>> assignment.
>>> As we're testing the tool, I'll continue to provide last call and
>>> telechat assignments in the traditional format. The gen-art.html page
>>> and the HTML assignment pages found on
>>> will continue to be the
>>> official method of recording and assigning reviews until otherwise noted.
>>> Please let me know if you have trouble accessing the tool, questions
>>> on how it works, or any feedback. I'm collecting bugs and enhancement
>>> requests.
>>> Thanks to Tero Kivinen and Henrik Levkowetz for creating and helping
>>> set up this tool!
>>> Jean
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gen-art mailing list
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list