Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review tool
"A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com> Thu, 08 December 2011 23:24 UTC
Return-Path: <mahoney@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDBB11E8082 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:24:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCjkACbuDA6T for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D14711E8080 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from A-Jean-Mahoneys-MacBook-Pro.local (pool-173-57-95-103.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.57.95.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pB8NNxiF033767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:24:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mahoney@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4EE1470F.5080507@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:23:59 -0600
From: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
References: <4EB05CA7.7080704@nostrum.com> <4EB2F94D.3060907@nostrum.com> <1321712082.29100.1783.camel@mightyatom.folly.org.uk> <4ED66240.40000@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ED66240.40000@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 173.57.95.103 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review tool
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:24:05 -0000
Hi Elwyn, I located draft-geopriv-deref-protocol in the all-encompassing Docs queue that is available to the secretary user, and I have placed it back in your queue for the telechat review. You should see two entries for the draft: one has your LC review, the other is in an "assigned" state, which you can accept and add the telechat review URL to it. Thanks, Jean On 11/30/11 11:05 AM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: > Hi Elwyn, > > When you enter a review URL, click Done. When a document comes back > around, it will be added to my "Unassigned" queue, and I can assign it > to you again for a second review. > > That said, it should have come up in the "Unassigned" queue and I > should have assigned it back to you. However, it's not in my queue nor > in yours. So I may have clicked "Finished" too soon. I'll have to > investigate further. Like Miguel's issue, this is probably a workflow > error on my part. > > I apologize for the late response. My machine suffered from hard drive > failure, and I'm still not completely recovered from it. > > Jean > > On 11/19/11 8:14 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I have processed my last call review of draft-geopriv-deref-protocol and >> updated the entry in the tool to indicate I have done the review and >> recorded the message URL. >> >> Now in the usual course of things the authors have fixed up a few >> things, there is a new version and I am more or less happy with the >> result. Mails have been exchanged... >> >> Now it is on the agenda for the telechat and I will (probably) be >> producing a review which says "Thank you. I am now fine with the draft. >> Go for it!" (or whatever). So where does a reference to this go? >> >> Or did I press done too soon? >> >> Regards, >> Elwyn >> >> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:27 -0500, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The review tool may not have sent emails upon user creation. Even if >>> you >>> have not received automatically generated emails from the tool, please >>> try to log in. If you have difficulties, let me know. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Jean >>> >>> >>> On 11/1/11 3:55 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> The Gen-ART review tool is ready to be tested. >>>> >>>> Users of the review tool should have received automatically generated >>>> emails starting with "[genart review tool]". >>>> >>>> Steps on accessing and working with the tool can be found here: >>>> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen_art_review_tool_how-to.html >>>> >>>> Please log in and check the My Info page for your user information, >>>> then check the My Queue page. Most reviewers should see one or more >>>> recent assignments, which are for documents currently in Last Call >>>> and/or on the November 3 Telechat. David, Elwyn, Kathleen, and >>>> Richard: your queues are empty for the moment. >>>> >>>> If the assignment is unfamiliar to you, I've probably fumbled >>>> something. Please reject the assignment. Otherwise, accept the >>>> assignment. >>>> >>>> As we're testing the tool, I'll continue to provide last call and >>>> telechat assignments in the traditional format. The gen-art.html page >>>> and the HTML assignment pages found on >>>> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/ will continue to be the >>>> official method of recording and assigning reviews until otherwise >>>> noted. >>>> >>>> Please let me know if you have trouble accessing the tool, questions >>>> on how it works, or any feedback. I'm collecting bugs and enhancement >>>> requests. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Tero Kivinen and Henrik Levkowetz for creating and helping >>>> set up this tool! >>>> >>>> Jean >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gen-art mailing list >>>> Gen-art@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gen-art mailing list >>> Gen-art@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review tool A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … Mary Barnes
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … Mary Barnes
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review … A. Jean Mahoney